[CCWG-ACCT] A message from the Co-Chairs

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Sun Feb 21 23:03:02 UTC 2016


I am sorry, you missed the point that I raised

The point was ,with ST18, the GAC will totally be disabled to agree on such
consensus  ADVICE as one single government  could always oppose to the
Advice. This was purposely injected in the Recommendation

That is the meaning of rare advice.

Pls kindly read the text as it MEANT and kindly not turn it around


Kavouss .

2016-02-21 23:38 GMT+01:00 Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>:

> Hi,
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:12:57PM +0100, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> >
> > *Consequently the so-called special privilege repeatedly referred to  by
> > others would in fact very rarely happens *
> In that case, of course, the carve-out doesn't take effect anyway.  So
> if this is in fact to be so rare, why would anyone argue that it needs
> to be changed?  The argument, "Such-and-thus effect is never going to
> happen, so we must set up the procedures around it perfectly," doesn't
> really seem to hang together.
> Best regards,
> A
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160222/ff95d606/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list