[council] gTLD registries' paper on new TLds

[Neuman, Jeff]

I was hoping to get some more substantive responses to the paper that was
presented.  

The registries will revise the introduction of the paper so that it reflects
that there were other ccTLDs added in the past 10-15 years.   

However, the substance of the paper (the failure of many ISPs, application
providers and e-commerce websites, to recognize a number of the new gTLDs)
deserves serious consideration.

I look forward to discussing this at the next meeting.

Thanks.

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP [mailto:mcade at att.com]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 10:09 PM
To: Milton Mueller; Amadeu at abril.info; Jeff.Neuman at Neustar.us
Cc: council at dnso.org
Subject: RE: [council] gTLD registries' paper on new TLds


Milton,  I can attest that the Evaluation of the new gTLDs Task Force
included highly qualified technical folks. And, yes, for myself at least, as
a member of the TF, I am fully aware of the addition of new ccTLDs to the
Internet over the past few years.  

:-)
Marilyn

-----Original Message-----
From: Milton Mueller [mailto:Mueller at syr.edu]
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 5:32 PM
To: Amadeu at abril.info; Jeff.Neuman at Neustar.us
Cc: council at dnso.org
Subject: Re: [council] gTLD registries' paper on new TLds


>>> Elisabeth Porteneuve <Elisabeth.Porteneuve at cetp.ipsl.fr> 
>1990 11  47 
>1991 22  69 
>1992 17  86 
>1993 23 109 
>1994 22 131 
>1995 29 160 
>1996 31 191 
>1997 47 238 

Gosh, I hope adding all those TLDs didn't harm the Internet's stability!
I sure hope that New TLD Evaluation and Planning Task Force takes a long,
hard look at the effects of adding those country codes.

;-)