[council] Re: Regarding issues report on IDNs

[Sophia B]

Thanks Tina, for the prompt response.
Sophia


On 26/01/06, Tina Dam <dam at icann.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Sophia, as it is a bit late in Cary's time zone I thought I would offer
> the answer to your first question.
>
> The committee is fairly new and the upcoming meeting in February will be
> its
> second meeting. The list of membership is available online at:
> http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-23nov05.htm
>
> Please note that membership may change over time as additional needs are
> arising in this area.
>
> Kind regards,
> Tina Dam
> Chief gTLD Registry Liaison
> ICANN
>
> Office: +1-310-301-5838
> Cell: +1-310-862-2026
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>        From: Sophia B [mailto:sophiabekele at gmail.com]
>        Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 1:47 PM
>        To: Cary Karp
>        Cc: council at gnso.icann.org; Tina Dam; John C Klensin; Patrik
> Fältström
>        Subject: Re: [council] Re: Regarding issues report on IDNs
>
>
>        Cary,
>
>        Thanks for the update.  Could I kindly ask for your confirmation on
> these two matters:
>
>        1) I understand that the President Committe is fairly new, may I
> ask
> who is represented on the committee?
>        2) I was also not aware that John was involved in the 'testbed'
> scenario until I saw the attachment you sent, based on some of his
> responses
> in the Council meeting.  Would he be working on that with you.
>
>        Many thanks ahead,
>        Sophia
>
>        On 26/01/06, Cary Karp <ck at nic.museum> wrote:
>
>                > We formally requested an issues report on IDN's in
> Vancouver.  However
>                > we were informed that there was some other work going on
> via the
>                > President's committee and also work within the IAB that
> would help in
>                > the development of that report.
>                >
>                > I expect we should have the report for our meeting in
> Wellington, but as
>                > IDN's is a large and very specialised topic I don't see
> that being on
>                > the agenda for the meeting in Washington.
>
>                The President's Committee was planning to meet earlier this
> week but
>                was rescheduled to 8 Feb. In the interim, the version of
> the
> IAB
>                "nextsteps" draft to which John Klensin and Patrik
> Fältström
> made
>                reference during our last meeting will be released. I will
> post notice
>                of its availability and suggest that the Council members
> review it
>                with a thought to its discussion at our own next meeting
> (hereby
>                proposing a corresponding agenda item). Since the
> President's
>                Committee will be meeting two days thereafter, we may wish
> to use the
>                opportunity to communicate our own recent thinking.
>
>                Also, at the two most recent Council meetings reference was
> made to
>                the development of an experiment for determining suitable
> means for
>                the support of IDN on the top-level of the DNS. Upon
> listening to the
>                MP3s of those meetings I note that we failed to make an
> adequate
>                distinction between the IAB draft and the outline of the
> experiment
>                prepared directly by John. I have therefore (with John's
> permission)
>                attached a copy of the latter document to the present
> message.
>
>                /Cary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>        --
>        Sophia Bekele
>        Voice/Fax: 925-935-1598
>        Mob:925-818-0948
>        sophiabekele at gmail.com
>        SKYPE: skypesoph
>        www.cbsintl.com <http://www.cbsintl.com/>
>
>
>
>
>


--
Sophia Bekele
Voice/Fax: 925-935-1598
Mob:925-818-0948
sophiabekele at gmail.com
SKYPE: skypesoph
www.cbsintl.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20060126/9e0d7a32/attachment.html>