[council] Motion for IRTP-B Final Report and Recommendations

Jonathan Robinson jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com
Wed Jun 8 15:21:46 UTC 2011

I understand that it may not be practical to vote on this tomorrow.

However, it is sitting without a second and so I am happy to second it.

Best wishes,


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: 01 June 2011 22:13
To: GNSO Council
Subject: [council] Motion for IRTP-B Final Report and Recommendations

A proposed motion for the final report and recommendations of the IRTP-B WG is attached in both doc and txt formats.

Thanks to Marika for putting this together. I made a few edits because my personal opinion is that recommendations 8 and 9 are not fully baked yet. While I have faith in Staff's ability to do what is asked of it in those two recommendations, I do not feel it is appropriate. There are policy aspects of those two recommendations that are yet unaddressed.
Using an implementation plan to flesh them out is not appropriate or fair to either the community or to Staff.

As Liaison to this WG I should have caught that sooner, but I am not sure the WG would have gotten any further with them either way. As a result I have left them mentioned in Resolve(D) but have not yet had time to ocnsider how to frame them. 

In any event, the Council has not had opportunity to discuss the report so voting on this motion during the meeting on the 9th is not practical.
The moton is being presented here to get it on the agenda for discussion purposes only. I do believe we could be able to vote on it as early as Singapore.


__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6172 (20110601) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.


More information about the council mailing list