[council] Motion for IRTP-B Final Report and Recommendations

Tim Ruiz tim at godaddy.com
Wed Jun 8 15:59:59 UTC 2011

Just a reminder that I did not make a motion. I submitted text of a
draft motion to start discussion of the report.


> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [council] Motion for IRTP-B Final Report and
> Recommendations
> From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson at ipracon.com>
> Date: Wed, June 08, 2011 10:21 am
> To: "'Tim Ruiz'" <tim at godaddy.com>, "'GNSO Council'"
> <council at gnso.icann.org>
> I understand that it may not be practical to vote on this tomorrow.
> However, it is sitting without a second and so I am happy to second it.
> Best wishes,
> Jonathan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council at gnso.icann.org [mailto:owner-council at gnso.icann.org] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: 01 June 2011 22:13
> To: GNSO Council
> Subject: [council] Motion for IRTP-B Final Report and Recommendations
> A proposed motion for the final report and recommendations of the IRTP-B WG is attached in both doc and txt formats.
> Thanks to Marika for putting this together. I made a few edits because my personal opinion is that recommendations 8 and 9 are not fully baked yet. While I have faith in Staff's ability to do what is asked of it in those two recommendations, I do not feel it is appropriate. There are policy aspects of those two recommendations that are yet unaddressed.
> Using an implementation plan to flesh them out is not appropriate or fair to either the community or to Staff.
> As Liaison to this WG I should have caught that sooner, but I am not sure the WG would have gotten any further with them either way. As a result I have left them mentioned in Resolve(D) but have not yet had time to ocnsider how to frame them. 
> In any event, the Council has not had opportunity to discuss the report so voting on this motion during the meeting on the 9th is not practical.
> The moton is being presented here to get it on the agenda for discussion purposes only. I do believe we could be able to vote on it as early as Singapore.
> Thanks,
> Tim
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 6172 (20110601) __________
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> http://www.eset.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20110608/32bb1cd0/attachment.html>

More information about the council mailing list