RESEND: [council] Proposed Amendments to JAS Motion

[Alan Greenberg]

I tried to send this yesterday but it didn't get 
through due to a change my ISP made...   Alan

At 19/09/2011 11:14 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>Just for the record, that is in line with what 
>the ALAC did with the second milestone report. 
>We forwarded the report to the Board and 
>reserved our right to provide comments on it at 
>a slightly later date (in that case before the 
>Board retreat, but after the report submission date).
>
>Alan
>
>At 19/09/2011 10:25 PM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:
>>Sure thing Rafik.  I will do my best to explain 
>>the changes.  All of the changes center around 
>>the fact that we want to send this report to 
>>the Board after the meeting this Thursday and 
>>not delay their consideration of the 
>>contents.  However, due to the fact that we 
>>just got the report, we cannot as a council 
>>state that we have digested all of its contents 
>>nor have we had enough time as a community to 
>>state that we agree with all of the 
>>recommendations.  In addition, we want to 
>>reserve the right as a community and as a 
>>council to provide comments on any 
>>implementation of the recommendations developed by staff.
>>
>>We also ask that staff begin developing an 
>>implementation plan (just changing the words 
>>from “begin working on an implementation of 
>>the recommendations” to “develop an 
>>implementation plan following the JAS WG 
>>recommendations, subject to comments received 
>>from the GNSO community”).  This highlights 
>>the fact that comments may not be comments from 
>>the Council, but can be from SOs, 
>>constituencies, etc.  IN fact, you have already 
>>seen some comments and questions from the Registries this past weekend.
>>
>>That’s pretty much it.  We want the staff and 
>>board to get this ASAP (and realize the ALAC 
>>will likely forward to the board anyway), but 
>>want to reserve all of our rights to provide 
>>comment and input on this report and any implementation.
>>
>>I hope that helps.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Jeffrey J. Neuman
>>Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
>>
>>
>>
>>The information contained in this e-mail 
>>message is intended only for the use of the 
>>recipient(s) named above and may contain 
>>confidential and/or privileged information. If 
>>you are not the intended recipient you have 
>>received this e-mail message in error and any 
>>review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
>>of this message is strictly prohibited. If you 
>>have received this communication in error, 
>>please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
>>
>>
>>From: Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak at gmail.com]
>>Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 3:22 PM
>>To: Neuman, Jeff
>>Cc: council at gnso.icann.org
>>Subject: Re: [council] Proposed Amendments to JAS Motion
>>
>>Hello Jeff,
>>
>>thank you for your comments and amendments, 
>>they looks friendly and didn't hear any objection in the WG.
>>but I would like to have more explanations and 
>>reasons about those amendments in whereas and 
>>resolved parts and their implications on the 
>>report. that will help me to have better understanding.
>>
>>Best,
>>
>>Rafik
>>
>>2011/9/17 Neuman, Jeff 
>><<mailto:Jeff.Neuman at neustar.us>Jeff.Neuman at neustar.us>
>>All,
>>
>>Please find enclosed proposed Amendments to the 
>>JAS motion from the gTLD Registries Stakeholder 
>>Group.  All of the changes are in red in the 
>>word document and should not be controversial 
>>and I hope will be taken as friendly.
>>
>>First and foremost, we want to recognize the 
>>hard work of the JAS Working Group and make 
>>sure that the work product gets to the ICANN 
>>staff and board for their consideration without 
>>implying that we, the GNSO Council or 
>>community, necessarily endorse all of the 
>>contents therein because of the little time we 
>>have had to review.  That said, we would like 
>>to see the ICANN staff begin working on an 
>>implementation plan of the recommendations, 
>>publish that plan out for public comment, and 
>>do so in time to  discuss in Dakar and launch 
>>the new gTLD Application Process in January.
>>
>>I hope everyone finds these amendments in the 
>>spirit in which they were intended – 
>>appreciative of the hard work oof JAS, 
>>supportive of providing support to applicants 
>>from developing economies and wanting the 
>>application period to begin on schedule in January.
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>
>>Jeffrey J. Neuman
>>Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
>>21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling, VA 20166
>>Office: 
>><tel:%2B1.571.434.5772>+1.571.434.5772  Mobile: 
>><tel:%2B1.202.549.5079>+1.202.549.5079  Fax: 
>><tel:%2B1.703.738.7965>+1.703.738.7965 / 
>><mailto:jeff.neuman at neustar.biz>jeff.neuman at neustar.biz  / www.neustar.biz
>>
>>The information contained in this e-mail 
>>message is intended only for the use of the 
>>recipient(s) named above and may contain 
>>confidential and/or privileged information. If 
>>you are not the intended recipient you have 
>>received this e-mail message in error and any 
>>review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
>>of this message is strictly prohibited. If you 
>>have received this communication in error, 
>>please notify us immediately and delete the original message.
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20110920/a9148bd5/attachment.html>