[council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review of the ICANN CEO

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

Interesting idea, but what makes you think anyone on the Board would 
care what the crowd had to say.  They barely care about what the duly 
constituted SOs, ACs or Review Teams have to say beyond what the by-laws 
force them to care about.

Now, if we can get National government ministers to crowd source the 
review, maybe there is a chance they will pay attention.

avri

On 20-Feb-14 22:11, john at crediblecontext.com wrote:
> James,
> Yes, we should include all, but the ball has to start rolling
> somewhere.  I figure we can do that.
> Berard
>
>     --------- Original Message ---------
>     Subject: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review
>     of the ICANN CEO
>     From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com>
>     Date: 2/20/14 1:01 pm
>     To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike at haven2.com>, "John Berard"
>     <john at crediblecontext.com>
>     Cc: "Council" <council at gnso.icann.org>
>
>     Also think this is worth of discussion, but should include other
>     SO/ACs in an effort to provide a “360” review.
>     J.
>     From: Mike O'Connor <mike at haven2.com <mailto:mike at haven2.com>>
>     Date: Thursday, February 20, 2014 at 13:35
>     To: John Berard <john at crediblecontext.com
>     <mailto:john at crediblecontext.com>>
>     Cc: GNSO Council List <council at gnso.icann.org
>     <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
>     Subject: Re: [council] Crowdsourcing a bi-ennial performance review
>     of the ICANN CEO
>     hi John,
>     i sense a certain irony in your reference to crowdsourcing, but i
>     went ahead and circulated your proposal amongst the ISPCP — initial
>     reactions are positive.  i personally think it’s a great idea.
>     mikey
>
>     On Feb 20, 2014, at 10:28 AM, john at crediblecontext.com
>     <mailto:john at crediblecontext.com> wrote:
>
>         All,
>         I think the next meeting of the ICANN, scheduled for London,
>         marks two years of Fadi Chehade's term as the organization's
>         President and CEO.  In light of the interest driven by the
>         Strategy Panels in what is called crowd sourcing, I wonder if we
>         should consider instigating a performance review of the
>         executive using that method.
>         We can announce the initiative in Singapore and prepare a report
>         for the London meeting.  The standing for the Council is the
>         growing executive influence over policy, looking no further than
>         the rise of appointed strategy panels in lieu of community-based
>         working groups.
>         What is your view?
>         Cheers,
>         Berard
>
>
>
>
>     PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com
>     <http://www.haven2.com>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter,
>     Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
>