[council] Flow chart - gTLD Registration Services PDP

[Marika Konings]

Hi Avri, 

As part of the PDP Improvements (see
http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/pdp-improvements-table-16jan14-en.pdf),
the Council agreed to 'Include draft Charter as standard element in
Preliminary and Final Issue Report' and evaluate after 6-12 months the
impact / experience of doing so following which it could be decided
whether the PDP Manual should be modified accordingly to add this as an
alternative to forming a DT (which is a 'should' but not a 'must' at the
moment).

Best regards,

Marika


On 02/10/14 15:41, "Avri Doria" <avri at acm.org> wrote:

>
>Hi,
>
>The correction of my recall convinced me to go back are re-read the
>manual:
>
>I noticed:
>
>> Upon initiation of the PDP, a group formed at the direction of
>> Council should be convened to draft the charter for the PDP Team.
>
>
>Does this present problems in relation to including a charter in evan a
>final Issues report at this time?
>
>Incidentally the impact analysis questions that concern me and that I
>believe need comment before the issuance of a final issue report relate
>to:
>
>> The following elements should be considered in the Issue Report:
>> a) The proposed issue raised for consideration
>
>This issue includes the rights impacts  that need to be an explicit part
>of the PDP.
>
>This is such a large and critical change moving forward, we need to make
>sure that the PDP starts on a solid basis.  Lets not make the same
>mistakes that have been elsewhere of trying to start a large and
>critical process without adequate public comment.
>
>Thanks
>
>avri
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5056 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20141002/be355c30/smime.p7s>