[council] - Preliminary Issue Report - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
Volker Greimann
vgreimann at key-Systems.net
Tue Aug 25 08:48:17 UTC 2015
Hi Steve,
thank you indeed for the update.
I see no reason to delay the publication, especially since the delay by
a few days will cause us to lose a full month at least.
Given that we can expect delays down the road as this will be a piece of
substantial work, I would favor publication sooner rather than later,
with a standard 40 day comment period.
Best,
Volker
Am 24.08.2015 um 21:38 schrieb Jonathan Robinson:
>
> Steve and GNSO Councillors,
>
> It seems to me that we need to think about a three points here:
>
> 1.Do we publish 31^st August i.e. ahead of the forthcoming council
> meeting and such that we can deal with this at the 19 November meeting
> as per option 1 below OR
>
> 2.Do we publish 3^rd September and, if so, does that necessarily mean
> we miss dealing with it on 19 November?
>
> 3.Regardless of 31 August or 3^rd September, do we think that a public
> comment period of more than the now standard 40 day period is necessary?
>
> Note: My personal opinion is that it would be OK to publish with a 40
> day comment period and then extend if that was felt to be important /
> necessary and that this will not be confusing.
>
> Thoughts / input will be helpful, especially if we are to publish the
> report by 31 August.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
> *From:*Steve Chan [mailto:steve.chan at icann.org]
> *Sent:* 18 August 2015 23:26
> *To:* council at gnso.icann.org; bret at uniregistry.link
> *Subject:* Re: [council] - Preliminary Issue Report - New gTLD
> Subsequent Procedures
>
> Bret,
>
> Thanks, great question and hopefully the information below is
> beneficial to the Council’s consideration of the 3 day hold, as well
> as the discussion around the extended public comment period. Regarding
> next steps and timing, here is the relevant language from the PDP Manual:
>
> /The Staff Manager is responsible for drafting a summary and
> analysis of the public comments received on the Issue Report and
> producing a Final Issue Report based upon the comments received.
> The Staff Manager should forward the Final Issue Report, along
> with any summary and analysis of the public comments received, to
> the Chair of the GNSO Council for consideration for initiation of
> a PDP./
>
> */The summary and analysis and the Final Issue Report are expected
> to be delivered to the Chair of the GNSO Council within 30 days of
> the closing of the public comment forum, though the Staff
> Manager may request an extension of that 30-day time for delivery./*
>
> Without knowledge of the level of public comment that will be
> received, it is difficult to estimate how long the summary and
> analysis and Final Issue Report will take to prepare. However,
> assuming 30 days, here are the three timelines expanded to include the
> next GNSO Council meeting, as long as the document and motion deadline
> is met. I would note, these are are the first, and not only,
> opportunities for the Council to consider the initiation of a PDP:
>
> * Publish 31 August -> 40 Day Public Comment -> Close 10 October ->
> *9 November PC Analysis & Final Report -> 9 November Documents &
> Motions Deadline -> 19 November GNSO Council Meeting*
> * Publish 3 September -> 40 Day Public Comment -> Close 13 October
> -> *12 November PC Analysis & Final Report -> 7 December Documents
> & Motions Deadline -> 17 December GNSO Council Meeting*
> * Publish 3 September -> 60 Day (for instance) Public Comment ->
> Close 2 November ->*2 December PC Analysis & Final Report -> 7
> December* *Documents & Motions Deadline -> 17 December GNSO
> Council Meeting*
>
> These are all estimates of course, and in the case of the first
> bullet, dependent on everything executing according to plan to be able
> to precisely hit the documents & motions deadline. Substantial public
> comment and substantive changes to the Final Report could ultimately
> derail these timelines.
>
> Apologies for the lengthy response, but I hope this answers your
> questions.
>
> Best,
>
> Steve
>
> *From: *Bret Fausett <bret at uniregistry.link
> <mailto:bret at uniregistry.link>>
> *Date: *Tuesday, August 18, 2015 at 2:22 PM
> *To: *Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org <mailto:steve.chan at icann.org>>,
> "council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>"
> <council at gnso.icann.org <mailto:council at gnso.icann.org>>
> *Subject: *Re: [council] - Preliminary Issue Report - New gTLD
> Subsequent Procedures
>
> Thanks Steve. Great news on the progress.
>
> On the timelines, can you remind me what happens after the close of
> the comment deadline? How do we get from the close of the public
> comment period to Day 1 of the PDP working group? How many Council
> meetings/votes between close of comment period and starting the hard
> policy work?
>
> Bret
>
> On Aug 18, 2015, at 1:26 PM, Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org
> <mailto:steve.chan at icann.org>> wrote:
>
> Dear Councilors,
>
> Staff is on track to be able to deliver the Preliminary Issue
> Report on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures for public comment by the
> end of August, as discussed on the previous GNSO Council meeting.
> However, I wanted to note that during the meeting, the possibility
> of providing for an extended public comment period was also
> discussed, which would keep it open through the ICANN54 meeting.
> This topic is expected to be on the agenda for the next Council
> meeting, scheduled for 03 September and as such, it may make sense
> to delay the publication of the report by approximately 3 days to
> allow for discussion during the meeting and a decision to be made,
> to avoid confusion from possibly amending the comment close date.
> The impact appears to be minimal:
>
> * Publish 31 August -> 40 Day Public Comment -> Close 10 October
> (note that this is a Saturday)
> * Publish 3 September -> 40 Day Public Comment -> *Close 13 October*
> * Publish 3 September -> 60 Day (for instance) Public Comment ->
> Close 2 November
>
> Staff is leaning towards waiting the three days and _immediately_
> putting in the request to publish the Preliminary Issue Report
> after a decision is made, but wanted to be sure there were no
> strong objections to this approach.
>
> Best,
>
> *Steven Chan*
> Sr. Policy Manager
>
> *ICANN
> *12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
>
> Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
> steve.chan at icann.org
> <mailto:steve.chan at icann.org>
> direct: +1.310.301.3886
> mobile: +1.310.339.4410
>
> tel: +1.310.301.5800
>
> fax: +1.310.823.8649
>
--
Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Volker A. Greimann
- Rechtsabteilung -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net
Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin
Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu
Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen.
--------------------------------------------
Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Best regards,
Volker A. Greimann
- legal department -
Key-Systems GmbH
Im Oberen Werk 1
66386 St. Ingbert
Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901
Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851
Email: vgreimann at key-systems.net
Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net
www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com
Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay updated:
www.facebook.com/KeySystems
www.twitter.com/key_systems
CEO: Alexander Siffrin
Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken
V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534
Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP
www.keydrive.lu
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting us by telephone.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20150825/d67ecc6d/attachment.html>
More information about the council
mailing list