[council] MOTION-- GNSO Response to GAC Copenhagen Communique

James M. Bladel jbladel at godaddy.com
Mon May 8 20:19:05 UTC 2017


Colleagues-

Staff has informed me that this motion was withdrawn, rather than deferred, from our last call. As a result, it is necessary to resubmit the motion, along with the draft response document. Both are attached to this message.

Thank you --

J.
------------------
James Bladel
GNSO Chair

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20170508/84659ef7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: GNSO Council Review of GAC Communique - CPH - version 25 April 2017.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 31965 bytes
Desc: GNSO Council Review of GAC Communique - CPH - version 25 April 2017.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20170508/84659ef7/GNSOCouncilReviewofGACCommunique-CPH-version25April2017.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Motion GNSO Review of GAC Communique - 6 April 2017.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 91461 bytes
Desc: Motion GNSO Review of GAC Communique - 6 April 2017.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20170508/84659ef7/MotionGNSOReviewofGACCommunique-6April2017.docx>


More information about the council mailing list