[council] [Ext] Sub Pro Small Team Updated Chart - Question

[Steve Chan]

Hi Anne,

You’re right, this table is no longer accurate (at least in so far as where the Board thinks things should trend towards). I had read your email briefly on my phone and had thought you were referring to the work plans/deliverables document. As long as that one is accurate, I’m happy! I’ll sync up the documents when I have a moment.

Does that help?

Best,
Steve

From: Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso at gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, June 14, 2023 at 6:19 PM
To: Steve Chan <steve.chan at icann.org>, "Terri Agnew via cou." <council at gnso.icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Sub Pro Small Team Updated Chart - Question

HI Steve,
Regarding the attached updated Sub Pro Small Team chart, my understanding with respect to Recommendation 9.1 was that the Small Team is tasked initially with specifying that it is intended to apply to PICs/RVCs that are enforceable under the current ByLaws.

I note the chart was not modified yet in this regard.  Are you able to clarify this by reply?  (It may be that this update is late-breaking after the meeting with Avri and Becky earlier this week.)

Thank you,
Anne

Anne Aikman-Scalese
GNSO Councilor
NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2024
anneicanngnso at gmail.com<mailto:anneicanngnso at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/attachments/20230615/24b2eec8/attachment.html>