[CPWG] [GTLD-WG] [registration-issues-wg] Subsequent Procedures

Fri Aug 10 15:39:45 UTC 2018

I sent this with another email by mistake so was blocked. Sorry

On 8/8/18, 11:40, "CPWG on behalf of Vanda Scartezini" <cpwg-bounces at icann.org on behalf of vanda.scartezini at gmail.com> wrote:

    Some comments on Christopher points

    a) Community Priority Evaluations
    what was relevant during 2012 was the fact that all the effort asked for community to prove support ( ltos of money to do this around the world ) was ignored during the analysis period and several community ( I have promoted few) faced auction though their competitors had no prove of community interest.
    Then, if we will impose some demands to community we need to make sure those items will be considered and none without similar qualifications will be compete with them. 

    b)metrics 
    Metrics for end users are security, respect to privacy and " continuity". If organization has no capacity to support initial investment so it will fail in a couple years and all registrant had done to promote the new domain will be waste of money.

     I have been promoting here 2012 round. But it was this, myself talking with several organizations to enter. We had a reasonable success but the reality was there was NO PROMOTION of 2012 round in the South Hemisphere. Nothing in digital news in local languages. ICANN came one day to Sao Paulo Brazil and I asked people to join - we got 50 attendees . We had 8 ( from 11 applied in Brazil)  that attended this meeting . Nothing else was done in South America.
     When I have done a survey in 2015 talking with big companies around South America I found just 1 that said they have no intention to apply if there was another round, all others responded YES, they had interest, please alert us, if there will be another round. 
    So - the point here is just one: MAKE HUGE PROMOTION IN SOUTH HEMISPHERE

    Vanda Scartezini
    Polo Consultores Associados
    Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
    01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
    Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
    Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 
    Sorry for any typos. 

    On 8/8/18, 07:49, "GTLD-WG on behalf of wilkinson christopher" <gtld-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of cw at christopherwilkinson.eu> wrote:

        Good afternoon:

        I generally concur with Holly's priorities in addition to my questions regarding Competition and Jurisdiction.

        Regards

        CW

        > El 8 de agosto de 2018 a las 7:09 Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net> escribió:
        > 
        > 
        > Folks
        > 
        > Having gone through the Report and Appendix C, the issues that ALAC has been concerned with before and - I am suggesting - should concentrate on in its response include:
        > 
        > Community Priority Evaluations
        > These applicants had priority, but the definition was narrow and few applications made it through on this. The definition needs to be revisited, and the evaluation more transparent and predictable- and finalised BEFORE evaluation
        > 
        > Metrics
        > Unde the general heading, the question is asked whether there should be success metrics.  We said - and I believe should continue to say - have metrics as to what success looks like from an ALAC perspective. 
        > 
        > PICS
        > Under global public interest, the question is asked whether there should continue to be PICS.  They are there because we argued for them - and still should 
        > 
        > Applications from outside the US/Europe
        > We expressed concern that most of the applications came from the US and, to a lesser extent, Europe.  We said this came down to a number of factors, including
        > Length and complexity of Applicant Guidebook - it should be more accessible, comprehensible, in different languages
        > Need for applicant support - maybe a dedicated round for developing countries
        > Possibility of variable fees
        > IDNs
        > The report mentions need for further work to be done on Universal Acceptance
        > 
        > 
        > Happy to discuss
        > 
        > Holly
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > _______________________________________________
        > CPWG mailing list
        > CPWG at icann.org
        > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
        > _______________________________________________
        > registration-issues-wg mailing list
        > registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
        > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
        _______________________________________________
        CPWG mailing list
        CPWG at icann.org
        https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
        _______________________________________________
        GTLD-WG mailing list
        GTLD-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
        https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg

        Working Group direct URL: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/New+GTLDs
    _______________________________________________
    CPWG mailing list
    CPWG at icann.org
    https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg