[CPWG] Applicant Support GGP (Task 3)

[Jahangir Hossain]

Hi  Evan and Sarah,

It would be helpful for us if we get the information on the *number
of applications of earlier zero successful applicants under the original
program*.



Regards /
Md. Jahangir Hossain
Member, Board of Trustees
Internet Society Bangladesh Dhaka Chapter
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jrjahangir/
https://internetsociety.org.bd/




On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 8:48 PM Carlton Samuels via CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
wrote:

> +1.
>
> I saw the announcement, responded and volunteered to assist. Not even an
> acknowledgement.
>
> FWIW, both Evan and I served time on the original WG. For full disclosure,
> the NCSG membership served on the WG as well.
>
> Carlton
>
> ==============================
> *Carlton A Samuels*
>
> *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment &
> Turnaround*
> =============================
>
>
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2022 at 10:30, Evan Leibovitch via CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 10:07 AM Sarah T. Kiden via CPWG <cpwg at icann.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I hope you are doing well. As you may be aware, the Applicant Support
>>> Program was developed to ensure worldwide accessibility and competition in
>>> the 2012 new generic top-level domain (gTLD) Program. It enabled new gTLD
>>> applicants meeting certain qualifying criteria to receive financial and
>>> non-financial support.
>>>
>>
>> Actually, it didn't enable anyone, there were zero successful applicants
>> under the original program. Much work was spent on the program with no
>> effective benefit (except for painful lessons learned by the team).
>>
>> The GNSO Council determined that the provision of guidance for the next
>>> round is best accomplished via the GNSO Guidance Process (GGP).
>>>
>>
>> How benevolent of them, considering that Applicant Support was started as
>> an ALAC/GAC initiative, initially with explicit LACK of GNSO support and in
>> some corners active hostility.
>>
>> When did the GNSO acquire the ability to impose its "guidance" on the
>> Advisory Committees? I must have missed that direction in the Bylaws.
>>
>> - Evan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CPWG mailing list
>> CPWG at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
>> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
>> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
>> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You
>> can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
>> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20221211/e3117509/attachment.html>