[CPWG] Resending Transfer Complaint metrics
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond
ocl at gih.com
Sat Apr 6 00:38:39 UTC 2024
Thanks for this, Steinar.
Looking at the table, there are indeed many reasons why the complaints
be closed as invalid, with a very small amount (15) in the period
covered by 2023 and even less before. But why is ICANN not pursuing such
complaints where there is domain hijacking? Are there other avenues an
end user would follow for this?
My other question relating to this topic is why 2021 was a huge year for
transfer related complaints being received. And an even larger number
for Transfer Complaints Closed. That year, barely 6% of complaints were
passed on to the Contracted Party.
Did procedures change since?
Kindest regards,
Olivier
On 04/04/2024 10:27, Steinar Grøtterød via CPWG wrote:
>
> Dear CPWG,
>
> During the CPWG discussion on the Change of Registration data (CORD)
> on April 3, 2024, a question was asked in the chat about metrics
> connected to domain hijacking.
>
> I have attached data given by ICANN Compliance for the periode Sep
> 2020-Oct 2023 that include unauthorised transfers. This metrics was
> given to the GNSP-TPR working group as information when the working
> group discussed the CORD policy.
>
> I hope this metric is ansers some questions. My understanding is that
> “domain hijacking” is not necessary tracked by ICANN Compliance.
> Registrars also reports a low number of unauthorised transfers.
>
> Regards,
>
> Steinar Grøtterød
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
--
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cpwg/attachments/20240406/43a0985b/attachment.html>
More information about the CPWG
mailing list