[CWG-Stewardship] Do we really need a Contracting Co.?

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Mon Dec 1 15:57:07 UTC 2014


On 01-Dec-14 16:40, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> - ICANN has built a highly diverse multi-stakeholder environment and
> we should leverage on that by providing mechanisms that will energise it.

Indeed the PRT does that.

The problem is that if the ICANN internal multistakeholder community
says A, the ICANN Board can say Not A, and there is NOTHING we can do
about it.  Thus there needs to be an external entity that the ICANN
stakeholder environment we have created can directly affect without
threat of capture by ICANN Corporate.

That is the primary Capture Entity we need to concern ourselves with:
ICANN Corporate.

avri

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20141201/6073625d/attachment.html>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list