[CWG-Stewardship] FW: [client com] IPR Memo

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Mon Aug 10 19:22:26 UTC 2015


On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Mueller, Milton L <
milton.mueller at pubpolicy.gatech.edu> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* Greg Shatan [mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com]
>
>
>
> On Monday, August 10, 2015, Mwendwa Kivuva <Kivuva at transworldafrica.com>
> wrote:
>
> Certainly, if the numbering community are asked to adopt another stance
> than that in their proposal, the community has to be given a chance to
> debate and ratify. That is part
>
> > And shouldn't the names community have that opportunity now?
>
>
>
> MM: The names community has had that opportunity for about six months. And
> it still does have that opportunity. The problem is that you have failed to
> convince even the names community that ICANN should hold the trademarks –
> there is clearly no consensus on this – and most of us here have expressed
> a willingness to accept the CRISP proposal.
>
​GS:  I don't think anybody has been convinced of anything, yet --
including a willingness to accept (or to give in to) the CRISP proposal.​



> So what Seun called “neutral” simply meant that there is no consensus here
> to overcome or substitute for the CRISP proposal, and in the absence of
> such a consensus proposal it is ok to accede to what the others have
> already accepted.
>
>
>
> > In any event, that doesn't mean an entire proposal would be sent back
> for re-approval.
>
> MM: No, but a refusal to accept the CRISP proposal and development of
> another alternative does mean an important part of the proposal would have
> to be re-approved by two other communities. And it’s not like we have a
> consensus alternative for the other communities to consider. So it also
> means spending another month or two developing an alternative. All this,
> for a position that seem to be supported by only you.
>
>
>
>
> ​GS:
> Just the emails that have come up in the last few hours have proven your
> last statement wrong.  I suggest that your other "nose-counting" exercises
> are
> ​o​
> ff-target
> ​ as well​
> .
> ​​
>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150810/260ac710/attachment.html>


More information about the CWG-Stewardship mailing list