[CWG-Stewardship] Updated version of the Status Overview for the CWG DTs

[Jonathan Robinson]

Thanks Chuck,

 

Do you have a view as to whether or not DT-J should (or could) run
simultaneous with DT-C (CSC) or should we wait until the DT-C is complete /
nearer completion?

 

With regard to DT-M, I agree that it may be a natural follow on to DT-C. A
key overall issue to be clear on is the layers of escalation (and which DT
deals with them) as we move from a relatively minor breach of an SLA on the
one end through to a systematic and repeated failure to perform and
moreover, an inability to remedy such failure at the other. Any further help
in clarifying the scope of the respective DTs as we work through this will
be helpful.

 

Jonathan

 

From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com] 
Sent: 09 March 2015 22:20
To: jrobinson at afilias.info; cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: RE: [CWG-Stewardship] Updated version of the Status Overview for
the CWG DTs

 

I do not think that Design Team J (CSC/MRT confidentiality and the
perception of conflicts of interest) should be merged with Design Team I
(Competition policy and Conflicts of Interest).  Proposed Team I involves
policy.  Proposed Team J concerns specific procedures that will need to be
developed for the CSC or CSC like body.

 

Design Team M (Escalation Mechanisms beyond CSC) seems to overlap with
Design Team C (CSC), especially the following items listed for C: 

.         (e) Specify an instruction for CSC, describing remedial action in
the event of poor performance of IANA against specified SLAs.

.         (g) Consider whether it would be appropriate for the CSC to be an
initial point of escalation for TLD operators who are experiencing IANA
performance issues.

It may be that Team M would make a natural follow-up to Team C or that M
could be subsumed by C.

 

Chuck

 

From: cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 5:50 PM
To: cwg-stewardship at icann.org
Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Updated version of the Status Overview for the
CWG DTs

 

All,

 

Please see attached for a status update on the Design Teams in preparation
for our call tomorrow.

 

Lise and I have reviewed the whole DT landscape and the current status is
reflected in the document.

 

Please note that it contains the following:

 

.         A status for each DT per the model of the step-by-step process
which has been referenced in Annex A.

.         A note section as part of the index to provide additional comments
as needed

.         New prospective DTs added 

o   L (IANA Function Separation Mechanism), 

o   M (Escalation mechanisms beyond CSC) and 

o   N (Periodic Review of IANA Functions). 

.         An updated description for .INT DT to match description in draft
transition proposal.

.         An 'expression of interest field', currently only in the
Authorization Function DT-D
(as other expression of interests come in, we'll create the same for other
DTs). 

 

Where a priority is set as final, that is the priority we have agreed. Where
it is provisional, that is indicative pending further detail on the DT
emerging.

 

I look forward to reviewing this with you on the tomorrow.

 

Thanks,

 

Jonathan

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150310/47f888d8/attachment.html>