[CWG-Stewardship] Client Committee

[Greg Shatan]

Olivier,

As you know, these are just "on the fly" meeting notes by our support
staff, and they generally don't get edited much.  To clarify, the
suggestion that was captured (more or less artfully) by this bullet point
was that we should try not to clutter the list with administrative
exchanges, so that the list is as substantive as possible.  So the essence
of the suggestion was to take the administrative exchanges "off-list," not
the other way around.  (I'm not sure I agree, but it does make the list
easier to scan as an archive if there aren't 20 messages about the time of
a call and who can make it, etc.)

I hope that helps.

Greg

On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
wrote:

>  Dear Greg,
>
> I have a question regarding the "client mailing list".
>
> On 13/03/2015 20:23, Greg Shatan wrote:
>
> The "client' mailing list was set up as soon as Sidley was retained so
> that we could immediately have a transparent list for the legal
> consultation.   Generally, we have set up lists for each subgroup of this
> CWG.    The client committee was an exception, and that exception has been
> rectified.  I'm surprised to hear anyone now suggest the list shouldn't
> exist.  They are helpful tools, and that will be particularly true with the
> client committee list, since Sidley lawyers aren't all subscribed to this
> main list (and it wouldn't be cost effective for them all to be here).
>
>
> In the Client Committee kick-off call, the notes/action items show the
> following record:
>
> *Public information and transparency*
>
>    - Hours reporting and fees will be public (on a monthly basis)
>    - Limit the email exchanges on CWG-Client list for administrative
>    things such as securing a time for a conference call.
>    - Archive is live: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/
>    - Most assignments are discussed by phone (recorded and transcribed)
>    and confirmed by email on public mailing list
>
>
> Could you please explain the meaning of the second bullet point? There's a
> huge thread on our CWG Stewardship about this list having ICANN staff
> subscribed (which I am not bothered by), and yet, is this client list only
> going to be used for administrative things?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>



-- 

*Gregory S. Shatan **ï* *Abelman Frayne & Schwab*

*Partner* *| IP | Technology | Media | Internet*

*666 Third Avenue | New York, NY 10017-5621*

*Direct*  212-885-9253 *| **Main* 212-949-9022

*Fax*  212-949-9190 *|* *Cell *917-816-6428

*gsshatan at lawabel.com <gsshatan at lawabel.com>*

*ICANN-related: gregshatanipc at gmail.com <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>*

*www.lawabel.com <http://www.lawabel.com/>*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150314/d05ede71/attachment-0001.html>