[CWG-Stewardship] Client Committee

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hi Greg,

Thanks for the clarification.

Cheers!

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 14 Mar 2015 19:57, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:

> Seun,
>
> Don't read too much into point 1, either.  Law firms always aggregate
> their time and bill on a monthly basis (unless they bill less often than
> that, or on a project basis).
>
> Greg
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 to that question as well as it seem to contradict the "rules of
>> engagement":
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/12DgI7ip73eg2i0x93QKpSPwhqeO0mtAeRTm1VSWZftA/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> Another comment from me, is that it seem Sidley is planned for a lengthy
>> period of time (ref: bullet point 1). I hope that won't be the case....Sign
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> sent from Google nexus 4
>> kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>> On 14 Mar 2015 16:26, "Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond" <ocl at gih.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Dear Greg,
>>>
>>> I have a question regarding the "client mailing list".
>>>
>>> On 13/03/2015 20:23, Greg Shatan wrote:
>>>
>>> The "client' mailing list was set up as soon as Sidley was retained so
>>> that we could immediately have a transparent list for the legal
>>> consultation.   Generally, we have set up lists for each subgroup of this
>>> CWG.    The client committee was an exception, and that exception has been
>>> rectified.  I'm surprised to hear anyone now suggest the list shouldn't
>>> exist.  They are helpful tools, and that will be particularly true with the
>>> client committee list, since Sidley lawyers aren't all subscribed to this
>>> main list (and it wouldn't be cost effective for them all to be here).
>>>
>>>
>>> In the Client Committee kick-off call, the notes/action items show the
>>> following record:
>>>
>>> *Public information and transparency*
>>>
>>>    - Hours reporting and fees will be public (on a monthly basis)
>>>    - Limit the email exchanges on CWG-Client list for administrative
>>>    things such as securing a time for a conference call.
>>>    - Archive is live: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-client/
>>>    - Most assignments are discussed by phone (recorded and transcribed)
>>>    and confirmed by email on public mailing list
>>>
>>>
>>> Could you please explain the meaning of the second bullet point? There's
>>> a huge thread on our CWG Stewardship about this list having ICANN staff
>>> subscribed (which I am not bothered by), and yet, is this client list only
>>> going to be used for administrative things?
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> Olivier
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
>>> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
>
> *Gregory S. Shatan **ï* *Abelman Frayne & Schwab*
>
> *Partner* *| IP | Technology | Media | Internet*
>
> *666 Third Avenue | New York, NY 10017-5621*
>
> *Direct*  212-885-9253 *| **Main* 212-949-9022
>
> *Fax*  212-949-9190 *|* *Cell *917-816-6428
>
> *gsshatan at lawabel.com <gsshatan at lawabel.com>*
>
> *ICANN-related: gregshatanipc at gmail.com <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>*
>
> *www.lawabel.com <http://www.lawabel.com/>*
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20150314/4ea68b67/attachment-0001.html>