[CWG-Stewardship] [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement

[Arasteh]

Dear All
We have received a draft in the afternoon of 10 August for comment within less than 10 hours.
It is FUNY AND JOKE????

Sent from my iPhone

> On 10 Aug 2016, at 17:22, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> I have reviewed the revised version of the Community Agreement which represents good progress over the prior draft.  I have suggested a few changes in the attached draft.
> 
> An additional open item -- we need a description of IANA Naming Services.  Again, even a tentative description would fill the void and allow for public comment on the draft language, rather than the void.
> 
> Greg
> 
>> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
>> All,
>> 
>> I am forwarding a revised version of the Community Agreement, prepared primarily by the IETF Trust's counsel.  Please reply if you have any further comments on this draft.  Please note that everyone (including the CWG) will have the opportunity to comment during the Public Comment period, which is set to begin Thursday.
>> 
>> The major open issue is the entity that will be the signatory for the names community.  It would be good to resolve this, even provisionally, so that it may part of the document when sent out for public comment.
>> 
>> Greg
>> 
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:46 AM
>> Subject: Fwd: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement
>> To: Client <cwg-client at icann.org>
>> 
>> 
>> Client Committee, 
>> 
>> Here is a revised version of the Community Agreement.
>> 
>> Greg
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Jorge Contreras <contreraslegal at att.net>
>> Date: Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:41 PM
>> Subject: [Iana-ipr] Revised IANA IPR Community Agreement
>> To: "iana-ipr at nro.net" <iana-ipr at nro.net>
>> 
>> 
>> All – here is a revised version of the Community Agreement reflecting feedback from our Monday call, as well as separate comments received from CWG and IETF.  I hope that I have reflected everything accurately, and look forward to discussing any final changes before public release tomorrow.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Jorge
>> 
>> Jorge L. Contreras
>> Contreras Legal Strategy LLC
>> 1711 Massachusetts Ave. NW, No. 710
>> Washington, DC 20036
>> contreraslegal at att.net
>> 
>> The contents of this message may be attorney-client privileged and confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message immediately.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Iana-ipr mailing list
>> Iana-ipr at nro.net
>> https://www.nro.net/mailman/listinfo/iana-ipr
> 
> <GS Comments on Community-Agreement - 08-08-2016 marked against 08-05 (1).docx>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160810/743fbd00/attachment-0001.html>