[CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community

[Seun Ojedeji]

Thanks Chuck and Jonathan. Jonathan's suggestion is fine so long as the
Co-Chairs are okay with it, as I think it may be asking too much from
volunteers. Putting other people instead distributes the workload and
improves diversity.

Overall my preference would have been not to put members of the PTI Board
on CCG.

Regards

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On 10 Sep 2016 15:51, "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson at afilias.info> wrote:

Seun,



Please note that the drafting of the letter of appointment (as per the
action you refer to) does not in any way pre-suppose the names of the
actual appointees.



As the call records will show, I put a strawman out for the IANA IPR Group
as the initial appointees for the CCG reps; 2 x Co-chairs (of CWG) plus
Greg Shatan (as CCG Co-Chair).



Any other suggestions / proposals are clearly very welcome.



Jonathan



*From:* Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes at verisign.com]
*Sent:* 10 September 2016 13:51
*To:* Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>; Brenda Brewer <
brenda.brewer at icann.org>
*Cc:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
*Subject:* Re: [CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community



Seun,



Note that it was suggested that Greg Shatan serve as one of the interim CCG
members; if we do that, it clearly would satisfy your recommendation that “a
third interim member is selected from the intellectual property constituency
”.



Chuck



*From:* cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-
bounces at icann.org <cwg-stewardship-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Seun
Ojedeji
*Sent:* Saturday, September 10, 2016 4:46 AM
*To:* Brenda Brewer
*Cc:* cwg-stewardship at icann.org
*Subject:* [CWG-Stewardship] CCG Reps for names community



Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On 10 Sep 2016 9:05 a.m., "Brenda Brewer" <brenda.brewer at icann.org> wrote:
> Discussed selection of CCG representatives.
> Suggestion that CWG co-chairs act as interim CCG reps until
a process is figured out by the chartering organizations.
>

SO: Like I raised on the call, I think we may be putting too much
responsibilities on the Co-Chairs who are volunteers. I expect quite a lot
of developmental/setup activity will commence once these various groups are
formed, which may imply significant amount of time commitment. I will like
to suggest we select other members within the CWG to serve as interim
instead. However, whoever we select should include someone from the
intellectual property constituency as I think this would be their area of
strength. The interims should agree to report to the CWG/COs and make
decisions based on their approval.

> ACTION (Client committee): instruct Sidley to draft a
letter of appointment of CCG reps.
>

SO: I left the room during this discussion, does the action above imply
that it has been concluded that we use the Co-Chairs? If that is the case,
I suggest a third interim member is selected from the intellectual property
constituency.

On a much lighter note, i hope it has been clarified that there is no
possible conflict in having PTI board members serve as CCG members.

Regards

> 5. AOB
>
> IRP will be functional by the time of the transition
>
> ACTION (CGWG): monitor development of IRP
>
> Next meeting 15 Sep @06:00UTC
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CWG-Stewardship mailing list
> CWG-Stewardship at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cwg-stewardship
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/cwg-stewardship/attachments/20160910/faadeae3/attachment.html>