[Gac-gnso-cg] Mikey's unofficial, unedited notes from today's teleconference

Thu Jan 9 17:41:53 UTC 2014

We have two topics and two volunteers so far.  One from GAC and one from
GNSO - possibly for the same topic?

We did not put a deadline / time for when the leads need to be in place but
agreed the need for speed.

Therefore, I suggest we work to a deadline of tomorrow (midnight UTC) and
then move ahead with the work of the two groups next week.

Thanks,

Jonathan

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org]
On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: 08 January 2014 15:50
To: Suzanne Radell
Cc: GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Mikey's unofficial, unedited notes from today's
teleconference

hi Suzanne,

dang.  i just had a brain-dead day yesterday.  i put the "early engagement
in the PDP" phrase up in the subject line of my note - i should have
repeated it down in the body.  anyway, that's the one i was volunteering to
help with as well - i'm pretty familiar with the PDP.  i'm completely
unfamiliar with the issues associated with the "day to day cooperation"
part.

all that said, i'd be completely fine with you as the rapporteur on the
Early Engagement piece.  i'll be a really active participant.  

but if you wanted, you could switch to Day to Day Cooperation.

thanks,

mikey

On Jan 8, 2014, at 9:35 AM, Suzanne Radell <SRadell at ntia.doc.gov> wrote:

Hi all, and many thanks for the exchanges yesterday during our call.  I'd be
happy to volunteer to either lead or co-lead (what do you all think of a
GAC-GNSO shared lead?) the second piece of the project, GAC early engagement
in GNSO PDPs.  If I've understood Mikey's email properly, he has volunteered
to lead the day to day cooperation element, yes?  If not, my apologies.
Best regards, Suz

Suzanne Murray Radell

Senior Policy Advisor, NTIA/OIA

202-482-3167

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org]
On Behalf Of Manal Ismail
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 5:53 AM
To: Mike O'Connor; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Mikey's unofficial, unedited notes from today's
teleconference

Many thanks Mikey for volunteering to take notes of yesterday's call and for
sending them so quickly !!

We, Jonathan and I, would like to particularly highlight the following
urgent actions, for those who were not on the call yesterday:

-          The deadline for submitting comments on the charter was agreed to
be next Friday, Jan. 10th 

-          Call for volunteers to lead 2 tracks of work, GAC-GNSO day-to-day
cooperation & GAC Early Engagement in GNSO PDP .. Both agreed to work in
parallel with 2 different leads and the participation of the entire group

Looking forward to receiving comments and welcoming volunteers ..

Kind regards

--Manal

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org]
On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 5:20 PM
To: GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Mikey's unofficial,unedited notes from today's
teleconference

GAC GNSO 7-Jan 

*	1. Summarise status quo 

*	+ - 2. Scope of Work - Charter 

o    Remove "yet to be addressed" line 

+ - "Initial proposal" -- are there any beyond the Reverse Liason? 

*	Table -- circulated to the list 
*	+ - Reverse liaison -- on the table -- 

*	There may be opportunities for additional mechanisms 
*	Looking for ideas to complement Reverse Liaison 
*	Ask staff for proposals and ideas 

+ - Highlight the problem of "different working methods" 

*	Hard to maintain the current "episodic" norm 
*	Matching GAC working methods with the current process 
*	+ - Amplify in "what it problem to be solved" -- perhaps add to a
different section as well 

*	Appears in Chronology section 
*	Appears in Objectives -- perhaps clarify/amplify here 

*	Taking the Joint Report as a given -- presuming that there's
agreement 

Title - GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on GAC Early Engagement in Policy
Development Processes 

Should "Who will be affected...." change to "Who is impacted by this issue
and proposals resulting from this consultation group"? 

Clarify timeline 

Clarify whether this is a one-time effort, or an ongoing iterative project 

+ - Stakeholders: 

*	Iron out the differences between staff structure -- include
Secretariats 
*	Anyone interested in gtld policy -- explicitly mention GAC and GNSO 

+ - Out Scope 

*	Timely exchange of information 
*	Delete the phrase from "out of scope"? 

*	+ - 3. Way forward - work plan from here 

*	Approach in the charter is OK - two tracks w/leaders, work as a
single group 

*	+ - 4. Practical issues including meeting times 

*	Time of day works 
*	Meeting *dates* are more difficult -- maybe the focus of the Doodle
poll? 

*	5. AOB 

*	+ - Actions 

*	All - review and propose edits -- by Friday this week 
*	Charter group - finalize draft for next meeting 
*	All - consider volunteering to lead one of the 2 tracks of work 
*	All - react to the questions in the table that Jonathan circulated
to the list 
*	Chairs? -- get on the agendas of our respective org's -
progress/update  

PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com
<http://www.haven2.com/> , HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook,
LinkedIn, etc.) 

PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE:
OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140109/1a4ffb3e/attachment-0001.html>