[Gac-gnso-cg] revised version of the charter -- forreview/comment/acceptance by the end of this week

[Manal Ismail]

Dear Mark ..

 

Apologies for the delayed reply and for not reflecting your suggestions in earlier versions ..

I thought the text we referenced during the conference call was satisfactory and addressed your concerns ..

Thanks for providing the text that accurately reflects your suggestion ..

I’m fine with the below paragraph and look forward to hearing what other colleagues think ..

 

I just have one question .. Are you suggesting adding this paragraph to the current draft or are you suggesting that this paragraph should replace some other text? 

 

You also said: “I also do not feel the text reflects reality if it says that the GNSO and the GAC set about resolving conflicting positions” ..

I believe you are referring here to this sentence “Resolving those conflicting positions further delays the process and may be seen as undermining past efforts that have been ongoing for quite some time”, right? .. Do you think your point will be addressed if we change it to “Board trials to resolve those conflicting positions further delays the process and may be seen as undermining past efforts that have been ongoing for quite some time” .. I believe this was the intended meaning, but I stand to be corrected by Mikey, Suzanne and/or Amr who were all part of the drafting team .. 

 

Kind Regards

--Manal  

 

From: CARVELL, Mark [mailto:Mark.Carvell at Culture.gsi.gov.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 9:03 PM
To: Manal Ismail; Mike O'Connor; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] revised version of the charter -- forreview/comment/acceptance by the end of this week

 

Dear Manal and colleagues 

 

As I mentioned in an earlier call, I’ve never been wholly happy with the text in the second paragraph of the Charter which I think underplays the disconnect in working modalities between the GNSO and the GAC. This is the problem we are now seeking to address. I also do not feel the text reflects reality if it says that the GNSO and the GAC set about resolving conflicting positions. The GAC’s interaction on new gTLDs during 2010-12 was almost entirely with the Board, wasn’t it? How about this as a revision to convey the objective we talked about today of facilitating early policy interaction between the GAC and the GNSO in order to build bridges: 

 

“The period of review and deliberations by the GAC often necessarily requires public policy consultations within currently over 130 national administrations. Furthermore, the GAC’s process for taking consensus-based decisions takes place only during the concluding stages of policy development and in consultation primarily only with the Board. These processes significantly extend the period for policy approval and implementation and it is quite possible for the GAC ultimately to take a different position from the GNSO and advise the Board against implementing the results of often long and detailed policy-making processes. 

 

This problem was identified by the…..”

 

Best regards

 

Mark

 

 

Mark Carvell

United Kingdom Representative on the Governmental Advisory Committee of ICANN

Global Internet Governance Policy 

Creative Economy, Internert and International Team  

Department for Culture, Media and Sport 

100 Parliament Street

London SW1A 2BQ

Dirrect line: +44 (0)20 7211 6062

e-mail: mark.carvell at culture.gsi.gov.uk 

www.culture.gov.uk

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Manal Ismail
Sent: 21 January 2014 18:10
To: Mike O'Connor; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] revised version of the charter -- forreview/comment/acceptance by the end of this week

 

Many thanks Mikey .. Super Quick as usual !!

Agree to all enclosed edits ..

While we are still on the topic and the deadline allows, allow me to make a couple of minor non-substantial suggestions, also included in track changes ..

 

Adding ‘Description of status quo’ to the below list as it has been an ongoing task for quite some time ..

 

-                  A mechanism for GAC early engagement in GNSO PDP (co-led by Suzanne Radell and Mikey O’Connor)

§  Description of status quo

§  Initial proposal

§  Issues arising from this proposal

§  How those issues could be addressed

§  An agreed documented process

 

Deleting ‘(unless there's preference to have 2 separate sub-groups)’ as this has already been settled

 

I promise to stop going through the charter and providing further comments J !!

 

Kind Regards

--Manal

 

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 6:36 PM
To: GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] revised version of the charter -- forreview/comment/acceptance by the end of this week

 

hi all,

 

i took an action out of the meeting to quickly turn around a revised version of the charter for a final round of comments.  here you are.  

 

mikey

 


This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. 
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

****************************************************************************
This email and its contents are the property of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it.
All DCMS e-mail is recorded and stored for a minimum of 6 months 
The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140122/c6a9ed00/attachment-0001.html>