[Gac-gnso-cg] version 7 of the charter - reflecting the last editson today's call

[Manal Ismail]

Thanks Marika .. I see your point and personally, I'm fine with
replacing 'at a very late stage' by 'at the end' ..

For the sake of the charter, I believe the more we stick to facts,
rather than opinions, the easier we reach consensus ..

Kind Regards

--Manal

 

From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings at icann.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 12:45 PM
To: Manal Ismail; Mike O'Connor; GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] version 7 of the charter - reflecting the
last editson today's call

 

All,

 

If I may make another suggestion for a change - could we use 'at the
end' instead of 'at a very late stage' so that the sentence as reworded
by Manal would read 'A timing difficulty arises because the Board seeks
GAC advice only when the GNSO PDP reaches the Board at the end stage of
the GNSO policy-deliberation process'. Very late stage seems to imply
that it should have reached the Board earlier but it didn't, while at
the end stage reflects the reality of the current PDP (the Board only
gets involved at the end stage of the process).

 

Thanks,

 

Marika

 

From: Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>
Date: Wednesday 29 January 2014 11:14
To: Mike O'Connor <mike at haven2.com>, "GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org"
<GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] version 7 of the charter - reflecting the
last editson today's call

 

Many thanks Mikey, as usual unbeatable speed J .. 

 

Dear All ..

I've included below the paragraph under debate for ease of reference .. 

"The GAC is structured under the ICANN Bylaws to provide advice to the
Board.  A timing difficulty arises because the GNSO PDP reaches the
Board at a very late stage of the GNSO policy-deliberation process and
it may only be at that time that the GAC turns its attention to the
GNSO's work.  [Only then does the Board request GAC advice, which is an
example of a process that appears to need review and improvement.]"  

 

The sentence "and it may only be at that time that the GAC turns its
attention to the GNSO's work." implies that the GAC does not know about
the GNSO's work until the Board seeks advice, which is not the case ..

 

Hence the suggestion I did during the call was: 

-          "The GAC is structured under the ICANN Bylaws to provide
advice to the Board.  A timing difficulty arises because the Board seeks
GAC advice only when the GNSO PDP reaches the Board at a very late stage
of the GNSO policy-deliberation process."

 

I also believe this serves the purpose:

-          "The GAC is structured under the ICANN Bylaws to provide
advice to the Board.  The GNSO PDP reaches the Board at a very late
stage of the GNSO policy-deliberation process. A timing difficulty
arises when the Board then seeks GAC advice because only at that time
that the GNSO gets to know about GAC concerns. [A process that appears
to need review and improvement.] 

 

For me, the sentence between square brackets is not indicated but does
not harm the meaning ..

Looking forward to hearing what others think ..

 

Kind Regards

--Manal

 

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org
[mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 5:03 PM
To: GAC-GNSO-CG at icann.org
Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] version 7 of the charter - reflecting the last
editson today's call

 

 

here's the version of the draft

 

m

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gac-gnso-cg/attachments/20140129/3ca1ab95/attachment-0001.html>