[Gnso-epdp-team] Reminder - input on mind map and questions coming out of ICANN64 meeting

[Alex Deacon]

Thanks Marika,

Here are the IPCs thoughts on your questions and how to best proceed with
the Phase 2 work.

Method

We believe the Phase 2 work should occur in two separate and concurrent
work streams.


   -

   Work Stream 1 will focus on issues and questions related to the system
   for standardized access to non-public registration data, as defined in the
   EPDP charter and the overlapping EPDP Team Recommendation #3.
   -

   Work Stream 2 will focus on completing Phase 1 issues.


We also believe that the "legal small team" should continue to meet
concurrent with the two work streams described above, with the focus of
drafting questions to our legal resource specific to our phase 2 work and
analyzing responses received (both existing and TBD).

Additional thoughts

   -

   Each work stream should set and work forward on its own schedule and
   work plan.  In fact we suggest that a separate report should be generated
   for each work stream.
   -

   Each work stream should schedule its own separate weekly 90min meeting.
     Access to these meetings is open to all EPDP members (and alternates per
   the charter).
   -

   In a lesson learned from phase 1, consensus calls should happen early
   and often.


Prioritization

Legal Small Group Priorities


   -

   We suggest the first priority for this team is to answer the
   controllership and legal basis question for a system for Standardized for
   Standardized Access to Non-Public Registration Data, assuming a technical
   framework consistent with the TSG, and in a way that sufficiently addresses
   issues related to liability and risk mitigation with the goal of decreasing
   liability risks to Contracted Parties through the adoption of a system for
   Standardized Access.


Work Stream One Priorities

   -

   Answer the gating question in Rec #3 - "Whether such a system should be
   adopted"
   -

   Identify the various legitimate purposes for third parties to access
   registration data
   -

   Move on to answering the charter questions on Access (a), (b) and (c) in
   the order listed.  (We note that several of these questions have been
   answered in Phase 1 and also by the TSG work.)


Work Stream Two Priorities

   -

   Issues related to Legal vs Natural distinction as identified in Rec #17
   -

   Potential additional purposes to facilitate ICANN's Office of the Chief
   Technology Officer as identified in Rec #2
   -

   Retention period issues and data collection as identified in Rec #15
   -

   The rest.  We note that several issues in this work stream are dependent
   on legal advice (see below).


Dependencies

Any large project with parallel work streams is subject to dependencies,
however we believe it is important that the EPDP team avoid serializing its
work and steer clear of (while still  recognizing) potential deadlocks in
the process.

Specifically, we appreciate the important legal issues related to
controllership, risk and liability and agree that these questions must be
addressed in a way that results in a win-win situation whereby risks are
diminished for contracted parties and authenticated/accredited users have
reliable access to requests for non-public registration data.  As above, we
believe that this important discussion happen in parallel with the work
outlined in the work streams.
___________
*Alex Deacon*
Cole Valley Consulting
alex at colevalleyconsulting.com
+1.415.488.6009



On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:50 PM Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
wrote:

> Dear EPDP Team,
>
>
>
> As a reminder, please share any input you may have on the phase 2 mind map
> (see attached) *by Thursday 28 March*. In addition, your input is
> requested on the following questions:
>
>
>
>    - How should the team prioritize going forward?
>    - What next steps should be taken in relations to the dependencies
>    identified?
>    - What should be the next steps in relation to the legal guidance to
>    date?
>    - What is the target date for publication of the Initial Report that
>    the EPDP Team is aiming to work toward?
>
>
>
> Please share any feedback you may have with the mailing list.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Caitlin, Berry and Marika
>
>
>
> *Marika Konings*
>
> *Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation
> for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *
>
> *Email: marika.konings at icann.org <marika.konings at icann.org>  *
>
>
>
> *Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*
>
> *Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_gnso&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=5DXgId95wrCsHi--pxTiJD7bMB9r-T5ytCn7od3CF2Q&s=Cg5uQf0yAfw-qlFZ0WNBfsLmmtBNUiH0SuI6Vg-gXBQ&e=> and
> visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gnso.icann.org_files_gnso_presentations_policy-2Defforts.htm-23newcomers&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=5DXgId95wrCsHi--pxTiJD7bMB9r-T5ytCn7od3CF2Q&s=tT-E2RoAucUb3pfL9zmlbRdq1sytaEf765KOEkBVCjk&e=>. *
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20190328/5bbb3b13/attachment.html>