[Gnso-epdp-team] Proposed Agenda - EPDP Team Meeting #74 - Thursday 23 July at 14.30 UTC

Volker Greimann vgreimann at key-systems.net
Thu Jul 23 14:46:10 UTC 2020


I support the language proposed by Marika with one suggested edit:
change " some preliminary discussions"
to " substantial preliminary discussions"

Considering how much time we spent (and lost) on this topic again and
again, this seems appropriate.
-- 
Volker A. Greimann
General Counsel and Policy Manager
*KEY-SYSTEMS GMBH*

T: +49 6894 9396901
M: +49 6894 9396851
F: +49 6894 9396851
W: www.key-systems.net

Key-Systems GmbH is a company registered at the local court of
Saarbruecken, Germany with the registration no. HR B 18835
CEO: Oliver Fries and Robert Birkner

Part of the CentralNic Group PLC (LON: CNIC) a company registered in
England and Wales with company number 8576358.


On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 7:13 AM Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
wrote:

> Dear EPDP Team,
>
>
>
> In relation to agenda item #4a, the Staff Support Team has worked with
> Rafik on coming up with proposed language to provide a status update on the
> topics of legal/natural and feasibility of unique contacts for inclusion in
> the Final Report. This write up took as a basis the RySG proposed language
> (see item #38) with some editorial updates:
>
>
>
> *Legal/Natural: Although the issue did get some consideration in Phase 2,
> this did not result in agreement on new policy recommendations. The
> requested study on this topic was received too late in the process to
> receive due consideration.  As a result, per the EPDP Phase 1
> recommendations, Registrars and Registry Operators are permitted to
> differentiate between registrations of legal and natural persons, but are
> not obligated to do so. Further work on this issue (including consideration
> of ICANN org’s Differentiation between Legal and Natural Persons in Domain
> Name Registration Data Directory Services (RDDS) Study) is under
> consideration by the GNSO Council.” *
>
>
>
> *Feasibility of Unique Contacts: “The EPDP Team received legal guidance
> that indicated that the publication of uniform masked email addresses
> results in the publication of personal data; which indicates that wide
> publication of masked email addresses may not be currently feasible under
> the GDPR. Further work on this issue is under consideration by the GNSO
> Council*.
>
>
>
> We hope this is a helpful starting point for today’s discussion on this
> topic.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Caitlin, Berry and Marika
>
>
>
> *From: *Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of
> Caitlin Tubergen <caitlin.tubergen at icann.org>
> *Date: *Thursday, July 23, 2020 at 00:59
> *To: *"gnso-epdp-team at icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[Gnso-epdp-team] Proposed Agenda - EPDP Team Meeting #74 -
> Thursday 23 July at 14.30 UTC
>
>
>
> Dear EPDP Team,
>
>
>
> Please find below the proposed agenda for the next EPDP Team meeting
> scheduled for Thursday, 23 July at 14:30 UTC (for 90 minutes).
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Marika, Berry, and Caitlin
>
>
>
>
>
> *EPDP Phase 2 - Meeting #74*
>
> *Proposed Agenda*
>
> Thursday 23 July 2020 at 14.00 UTC
>
>
>
> 1.                            Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes)
>
>
>
> 2.                            Confirmation of agenda (Chair)
>
>
>
> 3.                            Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5
> minutes)
>
>    1. Expected approach for consensus designation and timeline:
>
>
>
> From the GNSO Working Group Guidelines:
>
> *The recommended method for discovering the consensus level designation on
> recommendations should work as follows: *
>
> *i. After the group has discussed an issue long enough for all issues to
> have been raised, understood and discussed, the Chair, or Co-Chairs, make
> an evaluation of the designation and publish it for the group to review. *
>
> *ii. After the group has discussed the Chair's estimation of designation,
> the Chair, or Co-Chairs, should reevaluate and publish an updated
> evaluation. *
>
> *iii. Steps (i) and (ii) should continue until the Chair/Co-Chairs make an
> evaluation that is accepted by the group. *
>
> *iv. In rare case, a Chair may decide that the use of polls is reasonable.
> Some of the reasons for this might be:*
>
> *o A decision needs to be made within a time frame that does not allow for
> the natural process of iteration and settling on a designation to occur. *
>
> *o It becomes obvious after several iterations that it is impossible to
> arrive at a designation. This will happen most often when trying to
> discriminate between Consensus and Strong support but Significant
> Opposition or between Strong support but Significant
> Opposition and Divergence. *
>
>
>
>             Modified timeline:
>
>    1. *22 – 26 July – continuation of online dialogue on category 2 items*
>       2. *27 July – confirmation in google doc of proposed agreements on
>       category 2 items by staff support team – by 28 July groups to confirm if
>       they cannot live with the proposed agreements (if cannot live, proposed
>       agreements will NOT be applied)*
>       3. 23 *24 *July: distribution of Final Report and consensus
>       designations. As a reminder, the Chair will make an evaluation of the
>       support achieved for the recommendations and publish its designation for
>       the group to review.
>       4. 2*4*3 - 27 *29 *July: opportunity for EPDP Team to respond to
>       consensus designations, review by Chair of input received, if any,
>       confirmation by Chair of designation.
>       5. 27 *29 *July: deadline for minority statements.
>       6. 31 July: No later than date for submission of Final Report to
>       the GNSO Council
>
>
>
> 4.                            Finalization of review of cannot live with
> items:
>
>
>
>    1. Priority 2 related items
>
> ·         Item #1
>
> ·         Item #37-41
>
>
>
>    1. Any further items flagged after review of proposed approach for
>    cannot live with items documented in google doc
>    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/16BICriVfOPiEeve4A-x6TYKPbgRKqvhX/edit>
>    following 21/22 calls or following review of updated rec #8 language
>    <https://docs.google.com/document/d/10xb5eE3CxTvx5tFNmhsO_F7OdOIRMJFH/edit>
>
>
>
>    1. Category 2 items (groups to prioritize which items they would like
>    to flag / discuss)
>
>
>    - Item #95
>    - Item #101
>
>
>
> 5.                            Wrap and confirm next steps (5 minutes):
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
> Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/attachments/20200723/245249d2/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gnso-epdp-team mailing list