[gnso-gac-closed-generics] "A Public Interest" v. "The Global Public Interest" - Question / Comment on Asynchronous Work #6

Kathy Kleiman Kathy at KathyKleiman.com
Mon Jan 23 15:24:22 UTC 2023


Hi Greg,

Of course, it is an issue for us to discuss! I was just pointing out how 
and why the global public interest or a global public interest may be 
very relevant to our upcoming discussion.  See you soon in DC!

Best, Kathy

On 1/23/2023 1:56 AM, Greg Shatan [NARALO] wrote:
> Kathy,
>
> Asynchronous Work #4 specifically stated that, in responding to AW#4, 
> "We are not debating “a public interest” vs. “the global public 
> interest” at this time."  In other words, while AW#4 asked us to 
> consider whether the "Global Public Interest Framework" thingy could 
> be a useful tool in analyzing Closed Generics, it did not ask to 
> consider whether "the Global Public Interest" vs. "a public interest" 
> was the right "interest" to consider. Therefore, AW#4 does not supply 
> an "answer" to apply to Asynchronous Work #6.  The debate continues!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Greg
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 1:50 PM Kathy Kleiman <Kathy at kathykleiman.com> 
> wrote:
>
>     Hi Jeff,
>
>     Tx for your response and I look forward to our conversation ahead.
>
>     Quick note that our combined responses to Asynchronous Work #4
>     show that we /do /collectively agree that the GPI Framework
>     applies to Closed Generic TLDs.  We worked through the GPI
>     Framework element by element here,
>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pLDQfWtxx_g56v1xATL5oy2lFANMmYK9PPijesVjDkw/edit
>
>     Applying our answer to Asynchronous Work #6, under the
>     circumstances, would seem to make sense.
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Kathy
>
>     On 1/20/2023 1:04 PM, Jeff Neuman wrote:
>>
>>     Kathy,
>>
>>     Thanks for this response, but I still see a dichotomy between
>>     ICANN acting in the Global Public Interest and new gTLDs serving
>>     a public interest goal.
>>
>>     ICANN can be acting in the Global Public Interest by allowing a
>>     gTLD that may only serve a local public interest.  For example an
>>     IDN intended to serve a local public interest I believe is in the
>>     Global Public Interest.  In other words, the TLDs themselves may
>>     not have to serve the _global public interest_ directly, but
>>     allowing those that serve a public interest (whether global or
>>     not) to move forward, that indirectly supports the Global Public
>>     Interest.
>>
>>     Thus, I believe it would be the wrong standard for each new gTLD
>>     application for a closed generic to force us to determine whether
>>     or not they serve a global public interest (whatever that really
>>     means).
>>
>>     Sincerely,
>>
>>
>>     Jeff
>>
>>     	
>>
>>     Jeffrey J. Neuman
>>
>>     Founder & CEO
>>
>>     JJN Solutions, LLC
>>
>>     p: +1.202.549.5079
>>
>>     E: jeff at jjnsolutions.com <mailto:jeff at jjnsolutions.com>
>>
>>     http://jjnsolutions.com <http://jjnsolutions.com>
>>
>>     *From:* gnso-gac-closed-generics
>>     <gnso-gac-closed-generics-bounces at icann.org>
>>     <mailto:gnso-gac-closed-generics-bounces at icann.org> *On Behalf Of
>>     *Kathy Kleiman
>>     *Sent:* Friday, January 20, 2023 12:23 PM
>>     *To:* gnso-gac-closed-generics at icann.org
>>     *Subject:* Re: [gnso-gac-closed-generics] "A Public Interest" v.
>>     "The Global Public Interest" - Question / Comment on Asynchronous
>>     Work #6
>>
>>     Hi Jeff,
>>
>>     I’ll respond to your original message (and note that Philippe and
>>     Arnaud responded as well).
>>
>>     The reason we are talking about The Global Public Interest is
>>     because we have to.  The world has changed since 2013 when the
>>     GAC wording GAC Beijing Communique was far-seeing and
>>     far-reaching: *“For strings representing generic terms, exclusive
>>     registry access should serve a public interest goal.
>>     Seehttps://gac.icann.org/advice/communiques/Beijing%20Communique%20april2013_Final-ar.pdf*
>>
>>     A lot has happened since then, including ICANN’s Transition from
>>     US Government oversight.  As part of the Transition, the
>>     Community took on clear new obligations including “Core Values”
>>     of the Bylaws, and Core Value 1.2(b)(ii), that we work to
>>     “ascertain the global public interest.”
>>     https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en/#article1
>>
>>     Board Member Avri Doria, as you know, has been working hard
>>     “Operationalizing the concept of the global public interest
>>     (GPI)” that ICANN is now bound to follow.  ICANN continued this
>>     important work through COVID, putting out a paper in 2019,
>>     receiving comments, and publishing an updated version in 2020.  I
>>     cite from the April 2020 paper for the quote in the prior
>>     sentence,
>>     https://community.icann.org/display/prjxplrpublicint/GPI+Toolkit
>>
>>     Our Asynchronous Work #4, titled *GPI Framework and Closed
>>     Generic TLDs*, is exactly what the Board asked us to do.  The
>>     wording in our diagrams seems to be very appropriate. “This
>>     framework is anchored in the Articles and Bylaws,” Avri wrote in
>>     the GPI April 2020 paper.
>>
>>     I believe this Core Value was inspired by the GAC in the Beijing
>>     Advice a decade ago.  We now have two public interest guideposts
>>     and ascertaining the Global Public Interest is certainly one of them.
>>
>>     Best,
>>
>>     Kathy
>>
>>     On 1/16/2023 5:05 PM, Jeff Neuman wrote:
>>
>>         All,
>>
>>         On Asynchronous Work #6, there are several references to “The
>>         Global Public Interest” and the reason why I had a hard time
>>         with completing this work was in reference to that particular
>>         term.  In the GAC’s formal advice in Beijing (April 2023) the
>>         GAC advised*: “For strings representing generic terms,
>>         exclusive registry access should serve a public interest
>>         goal.”  See
>>         https://gac.icann.org/advice/communiques/Beijing%20Communique%20april2013_Final-ar.pdf*
>>
>>         The Advice mentions “a public interest goal.”  I view that as
>>         VERY different that serving “the Global Public Interest”.  It
>>         is very possible (at least in my mind) that an application
>>         for a closed generic may serve a public interest goal without
>>         serving “the Global Public Interest.” In other words, a
>>         closed generic my support a local public interest goal or the
>>         public interest of one particular country, etc. but when
>>         viewed on a Global Scale may not qualify.
>>
>>         I don’t know where or why we started equating those terms,
>>         but I think we should go back to serving “a public interest”
>>         as opposed to “the Global Public Interest”.  There has been
>>         no agreement within the group to broaden that narrow GAC Advice.
>>
>>         Thanks.
>>
>>         	
>>
>>         Jeffrey J. Neuman
>>
>>         Founder & CEO
>>
>>         JJN Solutions, LLC
>>
>>         p: +1.202.549.5079
>>
>>         E: jeff at jjnsolutions.com <mailto:jeff at jjnsolutions.com>
>>
>>         http://jjnsolutions.com <http://jjnsolutions.com>
>>
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>
>>         gnso-gac-closed-generics mailing list
>>
>>         gnso-gac-closed-generics at icann.org
>>
>>         https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-gac-closed-generics
>>
>>           
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>
>>         By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>>
>     _______________________________________________
>     gnso-gac-closed-generics mailing list
>     gnso-gac-closed-generics at icann.org
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-gac-closed-generics
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of
>     your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing
>     list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy
>     (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of
>     Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the
>     Mailman link above to change your membership status or
>     configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style
>     delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation),
>     and so on.
>
>
>
> -- 
> *Greg Shatan*
> *Chair, NARALO*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-gac-closed-generics/attachments/20230123/1c683f9b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 67520 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-gac-closed-generics/attachments/20230123/1c683f9b/image001-0001.png>


More information about the gnso-gac-closed-generics mailing list