[GNSO-GGP-WG] Actions & Notes |GGP WG-Applicant Support Mtg #5 - 23 January 2023 15:00 UTC

Mon Feb 6 03:22:47 UTC 2023

Hi all,

I had the action item from the last call to draft a question to the GNSO
council. After reviewing related part bylaws and in section 9, I would like
to drop my request as I don't think it is needed anymore.
I understand that:

   - ODA must be provided asap for the board consideration in toder to
   approve the policy recommendations from subpro.
   - GGP purpose is aimed to provide guidance regarding the policy
   recommendations and clarify for the implementation,

ODA is only an input for board decision making to approve while the
implementation will be impacted by the outcomes of the GGP.
I believe that the GNSO council will review our deliverables and when
approved pass them to the board following the described process in bylaws.
That ensures that our work will be taken into consideration and so I don't
see any reason to have concerns.

Best regards,

Rafik

Le mar. 24 janv. 2023 à 02:26, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org> a
écrit :

> Dear Working Group members,
>
>
>
> Please see below the action items and brief notes for today’s GGP WG
> meeting.  These also are posted on the wiki at:
> https://community.icann.org/display/GGPGIRFAS/2022+Meetings. Please note
> that these are not a substitute for the recordings also posted to the wiki.
>
>
>
> The next meeting will be in *two weeks* on *Monday, **06 February at 2000
> UTC (alternating time)*.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Steve and Julie
>
>
>
> *ACTION ITEMS/HOMEWORK:*
>
>
>
> *TASKS 3, 4, and 5:*
>
>    1. *Staff to send to the GGP WG list Section 9 of the GGP along with
>    related text from the Bylaws.  *
>    2. *Rafik to provide text of his question for the GNSO Council for the
>    WG to consider.*
>    3. *WG members to provide their comments in the Google sheet at
>    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13Q9QRDOBC0mdPBRDWxfMsUPtt4d-gVI9w8pBCkfugQc/edit?usp=sharing
>    <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13Q9QRDOBC0mdPBRDWxfMsUPtt4d-gVI9w8pBCkfugQc/edit?usp=sharing>
>    or via separate document by Thursday, 26 January for staff to integrate in
>    the main sheet as necessary.*
>    4. *Staff to draft a sample survey (ongoing).*
>
> *Notes:*
>
>
>
> *Draft Agenda*
>
> *GGP WG-Applicant Support Meeting #5*
>
> *Monday, 23 January 2023 at 15:00 UTC*
>
>
>
> 1. Welcome & Updates to Statements of Interest (5 min.)
>
>    - No updates to SOIs.
>    - Paul McGrady and Mike Silber gave a brief update to the GNSO Council
>    on the current status of the GGP WG’s work and work plan at the GNSO
>    Council meeting on 19 January 2023.
>
> 2. Update from ICANN org staff on Applicant Support in the ODA (30 min.) –
> see attached slides.
>
>
>
> a. Briefing from GDS staff (20 min.)
>
> b. Q&A/discussion (10 min.)
>
>    - Question: About the depth of services provided pro bono and how this
>    helped to encourage applicants. Were they paid for by ICANN? Answer: ICANN
>    or didn’t fuudnd them and we don’t know how much they were used. It is also
>    not clear how applicants were made aware that pro bono services were
>    available.
>    - Good in future to track whether the applicants were able to use the
>    pro bono services.  Need to track that usage.
>    - Comment: Clarification – understand that the ODA had to be released
>    before the GGP makes recommendations.  Will the ODA be updated?  How will
>    the GGP recommendations be taken into consideration.  Answer: The GGP’s
>    recommendation report will go to the GNSO Council.  It will inform the IRT
>    on Applicant Support.  The Liaison can take a question back to the
>    Council.  The GGP is not a PDP; it is how the Council gives feedback to
>    existing processes.  After the Board report there is a Board approval
>    process.   Staff will send Section 9 of the GGP to the list and ask for
>    comments with clarification from Rafik concerning his question.
>    - Question: according to the last point, there wouldn’t be "targeted
>    regions" but "struggled applicants with financial needs"?  Answer: Moving
>    away from regional designation of need.
>
> *ACTION ITEMS: *
>
>    1. *Staff to send to the GGP WG list Section 9 of the GGP along with
>    related text from the Bylaws.  *
>    2. *Rafik to provide text of his question for the GNSO Council for the
>    WG to consider.*
>
> 3. Continue Discussion of Task 3 (30 min.) – see attached document and
> Google sheet at:
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13Q9QRDOBC0mdPBRDWxfMsUPtt4d-gVI9w8pBCkfugQc/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
>
> a. Review Draft Discussion Framework (10 min.)
>
> b.. Discussion (20 min.)
>
>
>
> Awareness and Education:
>
> Row 2: number of outreach events and follow up communications with
> potential applicants
>
>    - Maureen’s comments: What could we propose from the GGP and how to
>    transfer that.
>       - Identify existing events that non-profits attend.
>    - Rafik’s comments: Split into those organized by ICANN and by
>    others.  We know with the first round that there was criticism that there
>    was no outreach.  We need to leverage networking in the community, but want
>    to see that ICANN is doing first.
>       - At-Large community keen that the wider community as to what ICANN
>       is doing and why it’s doing it.  So there is greater awareness.
>       - CPWG document: Discussion around how we measure success?  There
>       is the formal outreach but also community outreach.
>
> Row 3: level of awareness about the New gTLD Program/Applicant Support
> Program
>
>    - Rafik’s comment: Not sure how to measure – what is the proxy here?
>    A survey?
>    - Roz’s comments:  Need to consider where the outreach is going in
>    considering diversity.
>
> *ACTION ITEM: WG members to provide their comments in the Google sheet at
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13Q9QRDOBC0mdPBRDWxfMsUPtt4d-gVI9w8pBCkfugQc/edit?usp=sharing
> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13Q9QRDOBC0mdPBRDWxfMsUPtt4d-gVI9w8pBCkfugQc/edit?usp=sharing>
> or via separate document by Thursday, 26 January for staff to integrate in
> the main sheet as necessary.*
>
>
>
> 4. AOB: Next meeting
>
>    - There are ICANN staff offsite meetings the week of 06 February, but
>    staff will be able to support the regularly scheduled meeting on Monday the
>    6th at the alternating time of 20:00 UTC.  Thus, the next meeting will
>    be Monday, 06 February at 20:00 UTC.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-GGP-WG mailing list
> GNSO-GGP-WG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ggp-wg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ggp-wg/attachments/20230206/930b06b7/attachment.html>