[Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] Rescheduling WG call this week (message from Petter and Phil)

[Mike Rodenbaugh]

Thanks Phil, I was a week behind on email due to vacation.

OK would expand your sentiment such that any agreement on any issue
relating to any of the GNSO Supermajority advice re any and all IGO issues
is suspect on process grounds, due to exclusion of GNSO from this 'small
group'.

The Board should learn that its out of process policy development
machinations are not acceptable.

Mike Rodenbaugh
RODENBAUGH LAW
tel/fax +1.415.738.8087
http://rodenbaugh.com
On Jul 23, 2015 3:30 PM, "Phil Corwin" <psc at vlaw-dc.com> wrote:

>  Mike:
>
>
>
> As I previously replied to Paul, I don’t know if Petter and I can have
> other WG members on this call , seeing as it is envisioned for a small
> group and that will encourage a full and frank discussion.
>
>
>
> But I do think we should work with staff to provide a full report, as well
> as an analysis for how the discussion may impact the task of this WG, as
> soon after the call as practicable -- and schedule our next WG meeting
> shortly thereafter.
>
>
>
> Beyond that, I want all WG members to know that on this morning’s monthly
> GNSO Council call I raised the issue of the OECD letter during the
> concluding portion of the meeting and put Council on notice that this WG
> was stuck in place due to lack of access to expert legal advice -- and that
> any “comprehensive solution” on IGO protections proposed to be put together
> by the Board, GAC and IC ANN staff that addressed the CRP/second level
> issueraised serious process/policy development issues.
>
>
>
> Let’s see what happens on the call and what staff can advise us in the
> next week or two on prospects for securing that expert input. If
> circumstances dictate we may just have to take it upon ourselves to
> research the sovereign immunity scope question.
>
>
>
> Finally, in advance of the call – and we are awaiting word on when that
> will take place – it might be useful if WG members came together on a few
> points that they want Petter and I to emphasize when we engage in that
> discussion.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Philip
>
>
>
>
>
> *Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal*
>
> *Virtualaw LLC*
>
> *1155 F Street, NW*
>
> *Suite 1050*
>
> *Washington, DC 20004*
>
> *202-559-8597 <202-559-8597>/Direct*
>
> *202-559-8750 <202-559-8750>/Fax*
>
> *202-255-6172 <202-255-6172>/cell*
>
>
>
> *Twitter: @VlawDC*
>
>
>
> *"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey*
>
>
>
> *From:* Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:mike at rodenbaugh.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 22, 2015 11:10 PM
> *To:* Paul at law.es ZIMBRA
> *Cc:* Phil Corwin; Petter Rindforth (petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu);
> gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] Rescheduling WG call this week
> (message from Petter and Phil)
>
>
>
> Me too, thanks.
>
>
>    Mike Rodenbaugh
>
> RODENBAUGH LAW
>
> tel/fax:  +1.415.738.8087
>
> http://rodenbaugh.com
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:15 AM, Paul at law.es ZIMBRA <paul at law.es> wrote:
>
> Phil, I would very much like to be able to listen to this call or
> otherwise participate to the extent you feel appropriate.
>
> Paul Keating
>
>
> On 21 Jul 2015, at 3:15 am, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org> wrote:
>
>   *[Sending the email below on behalf of Petter Rindforth and Philip
> Corwin, WG co-chairs]*
>
>
>
> Dear WG members,
>
>
>
> Please be informed that after consultation with ICANN staff we have
> decided to reschedule our Working Group meeting, originally planned for
> this Wednesday 22 July, to end-July or early August. We are informed that
> the “small group” meeting between representatives of the IGO coalition and
> ICANN Board members was a positive one, and that an updated proposal is
> likely to be forwarded to the GAC and the GNSO for their review and action
> by September. This is in line with the GAC’s Buenos Aires Communique and
> the objectives of the “small group” process when it was formed to discuss
> the initial March 2014 proposal from the Board’s New gTLD Program Committee
> (NGPC). The IGO coalition and Board are discussing issues that extend
> beyond but are related to our work.
>
>
>
> With the aim to facilitate further progress of the policy development
> process, and to take into account the context of our work, which includes
> the need to resolve the outstanding inconsistencies between the GNSO’s
> initial policy recommendations on so-called “preventative” protections and
> GAC advice received on the topic, we plan to hold a call very soon, along
> with Jonathan Robinson as GNSO Chair, Thomas Rickert as chair of the
> original GNSO PDP on IGO protections, and Mason as the GAC-GNSO
> liaison, with Chris Disspain (Board/NGPC member) and Thomas Schneider (GAC
> Chair) within the coming week. The aim of the call is for us to receive a
> first-hand update on the work of the “small group” and discuss the likely
> progress within the GNSO, GAC and Board on the overall topic of IGO
> protections*, *as well as how this WG relates to the larger picture.  As
> such, we believe that it would be most effective and productive if we were
> to have our next WG meeting following this call.
>
>
>
> We will provide more details and a tentative time for the next WG call as
> soon as possible.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Petter and Phil
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2015.0.6037 / Virus Database: 4392/10258 - Release Date: 07/18/15
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/attachments/20150723/beade6a8/attachment.html>