[Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] Rescheduling WG call this week (message from Petter and Phil)

Thu Jul 23 22:48:07 UTC 2015

Can ICANN provide our WG with an mp3 of the meeting?

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Mike Rodenbaugh <mike at rodenbaugh.com>
wrote:

> Thanks Phil, I was a week behind on email due to vacation.
>
> OK would expand your sentiment such that any agreement on any issue
> relating to any of the GNSO Supermajority advice re any and all IGO issues
> is suspect on process grounds, due to exclusion of GNSO from this 'small
> group'.
>
> The Board should learn that its out of process policy development
> machinations are not acceptable.
>
> Mike Rodenbaugh
> RODENBAUGH LAW
> tel/fax +1.415.738.8087
> http://rodenbaugh.com
> On Jul 23, 2015 3:30 PM, "Phil Corwin" <psc at vlaw-dc.com> wrote:
>
>>  Mike:
>>
>>
>>
>> As I previously replied to Paul, I don’t know if Petter and I can have
>> other WG members on this call , seeing as it is envisioned for a small
>> group and that will encourage a full and frank discussion.
>>
>>
>>
>> But I do think we should work with staff to provide a full report, as
>> well as an analysis for how the discussion may impact the task of this WG,
>> as soon after the call as practicable -- and schedule our next WG meeting
>> shortly thereafter.
>>
>>
>>
>> Beyond that, I want all WG members to know that on this morning’s monthly
>> GNSO Council call I raised the issue of the OECD letter during the
>> concluding portion of the meeting and put Council on notice that this WG
>> was stuck in place due to lack of access to expert legal advice -- and that
>> any “comprehensive solution” on IGO protections proposed to be put together
>> by the Board, GAC and IC ANN staff that addressed the CRP/second level
>> issueraised serious process/policy development issues.
>>
>>
>>
>> Let’s see what happens on the call and what staff can advise us in the
>> next week or two on prospects for securing that expert input. If
>> circumstances dictate we may just have to take it upon ourselves to
>> research the sovereign immunity scope question.
>>
>>
>>
>> Finally, in advance of the call – and we are awaiting word on when that
>> will take place – it might be useful if WG members came together on a few
>> points that they want Petter and I to emphasize when we engage in that
>> discussion.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Philip
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal*
>>
>> *Virtualaw LLC*
>>
>> *1155 F Street, NW*
>>
>> *Suite 1050*
>>
>> *Washington, DC 20004*
>>
>> *202-559-8597 <202-559-8597>/Direct*
>>
>> *202-559-8750 <202-559-8750>/Fax*
>>
>> *202-255-6172 <202-255-6172>/cell*
>>
>>
>>
>> *Twitter: @VlawDC*
>>
>>
>>
>> *"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey*
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:mike at rodenbaugh.com]
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 22, 2015 11:10 PM
>> *To:* Paul at law.es ZIMBRA
>> *Cc:* Phil Corwin; Petter Rindforth (petter.rindforth at fenixlegal.eu);
>> gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
>> *Subject:* Re: [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] Rescheduling WG call this week
>> (message from Petter and Phil)
>>
>>
>>
>> Me too, thanks.
>>
>>
>>    Mike Rodenbaugh
>>
>> RODENBAUGH LAW
>>
>> tel/fax:  +1.415.738.8087
>>
>> http://rodenbaugh.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:15 AM, Paul at law.es ZIMBRA <paul at law.es> wrote:
>>
>> Phil, I would very much like to be able to listen to this call or
>> otherwise participate to the extent you feel appropriate.
>>
>> Paul Keating
>>
>>
>> On 21 Jul 2015, at 3:15 am, Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org> wrote:
>>
>>   *[Sending the email below on behalf of Petter Rindforth and Philip
>> Corwin, WG co-chairs]*
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear WG members,
>>
>>
>>
>> Please be informed that after consultation with ICANN staff we have
>> decided to reschedule our Working Group meeting, originally planned for
>> this Wednesday 22 July, to end-July or early August. We are informed that
>> the “small group” meeting between representatives of the IGO coalition and
>> ICANN Board members was a positive one, and that an updated proposal is
>> likely to be forwarded to the GAC and the GNSO for their review and action
>> by September. This is in line with the GAC’s Buenos Aires Communique and
>> the objectives of the “small group” process when it was formed to discuss
>> the initial March 2014 proposal from the Board’s New gTLD Program Committee
>> (NGPC). The IGO coalition and Board are discussing issues that extend
>> beyond but are related to our work.
>>
>>
>>
>> With the aim to facilitate further progress of the policy development
>> process, and to take into account the context of our work, which includes
>> the need to resolve the outstanding inconsistencies between the GNSO’s
>> initial policy recommendations on so-called “preventative” protections and
>> GAC advice received on the topic, we plan to hold a call very soon,
>> along with Jonathan Robinson as GNSO Chair, Thomas Rickert as chair of
>> the original GNSO PDP on IGO protections, and Mason as the GAC-GNSO
>> liaison, with Chris Disspain (Board/NGPC member) and Thomas Schneider (GAC
>> Chair) within the coming week. The aim of the call is for us to receive a
>> first-hand update on the work of the “small group” and discuss the likely
>> progress within the GNSO, GAC and Board on the overall topic of IGO
>> protections*, *as well as how this WG relates to the larger picture.  As
>> such, we believe that it would be most effective and productive if we were
>> to have our next WG meeting following this call.
>>
>>
>>
>> We will provide more details and a tentative time for the next WG call as
>> soon as possible.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Petter and Phil
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
>> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 2015.0.6037 / Virus Database: 4392/10258 - Release Date: 07/18/15
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list
> Gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-igo-ingo-crp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/attachments/20150723/96e591ed/attachment-0001.html>