[Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] PLEASE READ: Deadline for proposals and agenda for Working Group meeting this week

[Zak Muscovitch]

Dear all,



Further to Mary’s below email, and further to Paul Keating’s suggestion to
the WG of yesterday, I am proposing a revision to the original proposal to
be made, so that the below is now the proposal that I am making in
replacement of the one which I originally proposed:



“Our initial report and recommendation (that no change is required) remains
valid and should be reflected in the published report of this WG.  Our
report should advise that even if a change were advisable or appropriate,
such would necessarily require modifications to the UDRP and its
accompanying rules.  As such changes are within the ambit of the RPM WG, we
feel it inappropriate to inject our proposals in that regard. Accordingly,
the IGO WG strongly recommends that any changes to how the UDRP procedure
is drafted and employed for IGO's, if any, should be referred to the RPM WG
for consideration within its broader mandate to review the UDRP.”



Zak





*From:* Gnso-igo-ingo-crp [mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces at icann.org] *On
Behalf Of *Mary Wong
*Sent:* December-12-17 4:47 PM
*To:* gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
*Subject:* [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] PLEASE READ: Deadline for proposals and
agenda for Working Group meeting this week



SENT ON BEHALF OF PHIL AND PETTER (WORKING GROUP CO-CHAIRS)



Dear Working Group members,



We are moving toward concluding our deliberations on the topic of whether
(and if so, what) recommendation to make to deal with the situation where
the losing respondent files a claim in a national court but the IGO
succeeds in claiming immunity from the jurisdiction of that court. With
thanks to Zak for timely submitting proposed text on a new option for this
topic, which we will consider on our next call this Thursday, we request
that *if any Working Group member has any proposed text for consideration,
please submit the actual text you are proposing for Working Group
consideration no later than one hour before the Thursday call (i.e. 1600
UTC on 14 December). **This will be the deadline for submission of any
options to be included in any further polling of the WG for support or
opposition*.



The proposed agenda for the call this Thursday is as follows:

   1. Roll call/updates to Statements of Interest
   2. Co-Chairs’ recap of discussion with Nominet legal counsel on the
   Nominet appeal process
   3. Review of text proposed by Zak for a new option (in the context of a
   possible Recommendation #3)
   4. Presentation of Co-Chairs’ proposal for concluding deliberations on
   Recommendation #3 and conducting the Working Group Consensus Call for all
   Recommendations and options
   5. Scheduling the next meeting



We hope that as many Working Group members as possible can attend the call
this week, as we hope to wrap up discussions on this one remaining possible
recommendation, and proceed with the formal Consensus Call before the end
of this year.



Best regards,



Phil and Petter
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/attachments/20171214/aefdf00f/attachment-0001.html>