[Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] PLEASE READ: Deadline for proposals and agenda for Working Group meeting this week

[Corwin, Philip]

Thanks for this update, Zak



Philip S. Corwin

Policy Counsel

VeriSign, Inc.

12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

703-948-4648/Direct

571-342-7489/Cell



"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey



From: Gnso-igo-ingo-crp [mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Zak Muscovitch
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 10:52 AM
To: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>; gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] PLEASE READ: Deadline for proposals and agenda for Working Group meeting this week



Dear all,



Further to Mary’s below email, and further to Paul Keating’s suggestion to the WG of yesterday, I am proposing a revision to the original proposal to be made, so that the below is now the proposal that I am making in replacement of the one which I originally proposed:



“Our initial report and recommendation (that no change is required) remains valid and should be reflected in the published report of this WG.  Our report should advise that even if a change were advisable or appropriate, such would necessarily require modifications to the UDRP and its accompanying rules.  As such changes are within the ambit of the RPM WG, we feel it inappropriate to inject our proposals in that regard. Accordingly, the IGO WG strongly recommends that any changes to how the UDRP procedure is drafted and employed for IGO's, if any, should be referred to the RPM WG for consideration within its broader mandate to review the UDRP.”



Zak





From: Gnso-igo-ingo-crp [mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces at icann.org<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp-bounces at icann.org>] On Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: December-12-17 4:47 PM
To: gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo-crp at icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] PLEASE READ: Deadline for proposals and agenda for Working Group meeting this week



SENT ON BEHALF OF PHIL AND PETTER (WORKING GROUP CO-CHAIRS)



Dear Working Group members,



We are moving toward concluding our deliberations on the topic of whether (and if so, what) recommendation to make to deal with the situation where the losing respondent files a claim in a national court but the IGO succeeds in claiming immunity from the jurisdiction of that court. With thanks to Zak for timely submitting proposed text on a new option for this topic, which we will consider on our next call this Thursday, we request that if any Working Group member has any proposed text for consideration, please submit the actual text you are proposing for Working Group consideration no later than one hour before the Thursday call (i.e. 1600 UTC on 14 December). This will be the deadline for submission of any options to be included in any further polling of the WG for support or opposition.



The proposed agenda for the call this Thursday is as follows:

1.      Roll call/updates to Statements of Interest
2.      Co-Chairs’ recap of discussion with Nominet legal counsel on the Nominet appeal process
3.      Review of text proposed by Zak for a new option (in the context of a possible Recommendation #3)
4.      Presentation of Co-Chairs’ proposal for concluding deliberations on Recommendation #3 and conducting the Working Group Consensus Call for all Recommendations and options
5.      Scheduling the next meeting



We hope that as many Working Group members as possible can attend the call this week, as we hope to wrap up discussions on this one remaining possible recommendation, and proceed with the formal Consensus Call before the end of this year.



Best regards,



Phil and Petter



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/attachments/20171214/09072f4b/attachment-0001.html>