[Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] Public Display of Possible Consensus

[George Kirikos]

Hi folks,

Since there's been no response to the call for the true numbers to be posted:

https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2018-May/001140.html

let's attempt to do this transparently. I believe we might already
have a consensus.

The 6 options (not mutually exclusive!) were at:

https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2018-March/001093.html

Briefly:

Option 1: set aside the UDRP/URS decision, to put both sides back in
the same position

Option 2: use Option 1 for existing domain names, and Option 3 for
newly created domains

Option 3: arbitration

Option 4: refer it to the RPM PDP

Option 5: lock the domains in the event of an "in rem" lawsuit (not
just "in personam")

Option 6: mediation as a step, and then back to Option 1 if need be

If you'd like to post your position/thoughts in an open and
transparent manner, please do so in this thread, using the following
template

----------------------------------

Name:
Option 1:
Option 2:
Option 3:
Option 4:
Option 5:
Option 6:

----------------------------------

For myself:

Option 1: yes, I support this (ultimately my first choice)

Option 2: yes, I can support this as a compromise

Option 3: no, I can't support this

Option 4: yes, I can support this; Paul Keating's prior suggestion of
having Option 1 be the interim solution if Option 4 is

Option 5: yes, I support this, and it works in parallel to all other options

Option 6: yes, I support mediation

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
416-588-0269
http://www.leap.com/