[Gnso-igo-ingo-crp] Public Display of Possible Consensus

George Kirikos icann at leap.com
Mon May 7 19:46:03 UTC 2018


Oops, part of my response (in #4) got cut off. Let me retry this:

----------------------------------
Name: George Kirikos

Option 1: yes, I support this (ultimately my first choice)

Option 2: yes, I can support this as a compromise

Option 3: no, I can't support this

Option 4: yes, I can support this; Paul Keating's prior suggestion of
having Option 1 be the interim solution if Option 4 is adopted is also
fine with me

Option 5: yes, I support this, and it works in parallel to all other options

Option 6: yes, I support mediation
----------------------------------

Sincerely,

George Kirikos
416-588-0269
http://www.leap.com/



On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 2:42 PM, George Kirikos <icann at leap.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Since there's been no response to the call for the true numbers to be posted:
>
> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2018-May/001140.html
>
> let's attempt to do this transparently. I believe we might already
> have a consensus.
>
> The 6 options (not mutually exclusive!) were at:
>
> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-igo-ingo-crp/2018-March/001093.html
>
> Briefly:
>
> Option 1: set aside the UDRP/URS decision, to put both sides back in
> the same position
>
> Option 2: use Option 1 for existing domain names, and Option 3 for
> newly created domains
>
> Option 3: arbitration
>
> Option 4: refer it to the RPM PDP
>
> Option 5: lock the domains in the event of an "in rem" lawsuit (not
> just "in personam")
>
> Option 6: mediation as a step, and then back to Option 1 if need be
>
> If you'd like to post your position/thoughts in an open and
> transparent manner, please do so in this thread, using the following
> template
>
> ----------------------------------
>
> Name:
> Option 1:
> Option 2:
> Option 3:
> Option 4:
> Option 5:
> Option 6:
>
> ----------------------------------
>
> For myself:
>
> Option 1: yes, I support this (ultimately my first choice)
>
> Option 2: yes, I can support this as a compromise
>
> Option 3: no, I can't support this
>
> Option 4: yes, I can support this; Paul Keating's prior suggestion of
> having Option 1 be the interim solution if Option 4 is
>
> Option 5: yes, I support this, and it works in parallel to all other options
>
> Option 6: yes, I support mediation
>
> Sincerely,
>
> George Kirikos
> 416-588-0269
> http://www.leap.com/


More information about the Gnso-igo-ingo-crp mailing list