[Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - 18 June 2018 at 15:00 UTC

[Rubens Kuhl]

> Em 18 de jun de 2018, à(s) 08:58:000, lists at christopherwilkinson.eu Wilkinson <lists at christopherwilkinson.eu> escreveu:
> 
> Phil - The only hint we have to date is that, apparently for security reasons, a rate of about 1000 new TLDs per year would be manageable.
> 
> 
There is no such assertion anywhere either in the 2012 round or the next. I'll refer you to the security and stability section of the report, where we document that 1000 per year would be an administrative capacity limit, and for that capacity, it was said that it would not cause operational issues. That's different from saying that's the system limit, and what you can see in the report is the definition to not impose a limit, but to follow prudence and monitoring during the delegation cycle.

> 1.  Personally, I find that figure rather high notably because of the lead times required between an application and a final delegation in the Root.  I have asked on the Calls for an indication from the ICANN staff as to how many new applications, per month, they can handle in terms of the economic and technical due diligence that I assume would be required. We have not yet had a response.
> 

There was no economical due diligence made in the previous or foreseen for the next round.

> 
> 2.  I have also proposed that in policy terms the issue should be disaggregated into more manageable batches of categories, since many of the relevant parameters will be distinct. The obvious categories would be Brands, Geographical Names, Geographical Indications and IDNs (by script). There could be other re-groupiings of applications such as undeserved regions and Communities.
> Policy would of course determine priorities in time.
> 
> 
> These options have not yet been discussed by the Work Tracks concerned.
> 
I remember a WT discussing exactly this option and deciding not to follow it. Note that WT discussions go a long way back before you joined, so reading the wiki with the session transcripts would be interesting to avoid getting to impressions like this.


Rubens


> Regards
> 
> Christopher
> 
> 
>> El 17 de junio de 2018 a las 23:16 Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br> escribió:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 17 Jun 2018, at 14:59, Phil Buckingham <phil at dotadvice.co.uk <mailto:phil at dotadvice.co.uk>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Steve,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the agenda.
>>> Sorry I won’t be able to make the call. I am at Royal Ascot, watching the horse races with Her Majesty  !
>>> 
>>> Would it be possible to send a link to the Executive Summary. Will  this executive summary show the number of anticipated applications and the associated costings , as well as timelines.
>>> 
>> 
>> I don't think it was ever envisioned for the PDP to have those results, since they are dependent on both policy and program implementation.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Rubens
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
>> Gnso-newgtld-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20180618/13d98408/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 528 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/attachments/20180618/13d98408/signature-0001.asc>