[Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Questions for P/P providers from the WG call earlier today
Kathy Kleiman
kathy at kathykleiman.com
Tue Sep 23 14:12:18 UTC 2014
Tx Chris and All,
There seems to be a pattern here that certainly defies some of my
assumptions coming into the WG:
1. P/P Providers dedicate a lot of time and care to Reveal
2. Many P/P are not webhosts
3. So content is generally outside their balliwick.
==> This certainly changes my analysis a bit. Tx you for the insight!
Kathy
:
> Hi All,
>
> Let me answer from our point of view and how we handle things :
>
> 1. Because we look at EACH and EVERY request manually if by ticket or
> mail, all requests for disclosure are passed to the PP customer, we
> ask the 2 parties requestee and pp customer to resolve whatever issue
> between them, as this is the best way forward for all parties.
> 2. There is little point allowing a deletion of the domain, as it
> will then simply be registered elsewhere. However, in point 1 getting
> the 2 parties talking and more to the point a resolution fixes the issue.
> 3. Case by Case basis - we do not host material for example, thus
> DMCA as an example is simply passed on. If the issue is with the
> actual domain name, then UDRP.
> 4. Well I can answer this one, in the last year we have had 2
> requests if memory serves and thus 2 disclosures.
> 5. As 4, only LEA. We would only disclose on LEA request (in our
> jurisdiction) or Court order.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Chris
>
> NetEarth One, inc
>
> On 16/09/2014 11:38 PM, Mary Wong wrote:
>> Dear WG members,
>>
>> With the Chairs' consent, I'm sending on the questions that were
>> asked by several WG members during the call earlier today, in the
>> hopes that those members who are or know of P/P providers and their
>> practices can respond. If links to or copies of provider practices
>> and policies can be provided, that would be very helpful too.
>>
>> 1. What are provider practices regarding customer notification when
>> a disclosure request is received, and is the customer given the
>> opportunity to respond? (Note - on the call, James had agreed to
>> provide information about DBP; Graeme and Michele had responded
>> on behalf of their respective companies -- perhaps other
>> providers besides DBP can also step in here?)
>> 2. Does any provider offer its customer an option other than
>> disclosure or publication, e.g. an opportunity to cancel the
>> registration instead (i.e. what some WG members have mentioned as
>> a "takedown")?
>> 3. What are provider "standards" for determining disclosure to third
>> parties?
>> 4. Can providers give the WG some general information about the
>> percentage of requests for disclosure that are successful
>> 5. For Q4, do providers also have information about the type of
>> claims those relate to e.g. If they are from LEA, 3P IP claim etc.?
>>
>> As also noted on the call, the Chairs will discuss some of the
>> responses and suggestions that were made, with a view toward
>> hopefully offering some kind of summary or recommendation in time for
>> the call next week.
>>
>> Thanks and cheers
>> Mary
>>
>> Mary Wong
>> Senior Policy Director
>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
>> Email: mary.wong at icann.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
>> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg/attachments/20140923/b8403b5e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
mailing list