[GNSO-RPM-WG] REMINDER: Proposed Agenda for RPMs PDP WG Meeting - 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC

[Mike]

It seems pretty generous to me to describe the secrecy of the TMCH as a “consensus policy” (would love it if you could show me exactly when and how that specific idea attained consensus) - but that’s not an issue we need to revisit in any depth. 

Rather, I would suggest we stick to the substance of the comments we got back, and avenues forward.

Best,
Michael

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 20, 2020, at 6:49 PM, cking at modernip.com wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi All,
>  
> Respectfully, I believe this would be a waste of our remaining time.
>  
> The Proposal had significant opposition (at least as much opposition as support).  As well, consensus has never been reached in discussions by the full working group or (2) subgroups.
>  
> As consensus is needed to change an RPM that is itself the result of consensus discussions; and
> 
> As we haven’t been close to consensus in the working group, sub-groups or public comments; then
> 
> I suggest we complete our review concentrating on Proposals where consensus may still be possible.
>  
>                         
> Cyntia King
> O:  +1 816.633.7647
> C:  +1 818.209.6088
> <image001.jpg>
>  
> From: GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Jason Schaeffer
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 11:18 AM
> To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>; gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [GNSO-RPM-WG] REMINDER: Proposed Agenda for RPMs PDP WG Meeting - 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC
>  
> Hi all,
>  
> In advance of tomorrow’s call, I am requesting that we continue discussion on the merits of TMCH Question #7.    Upon reflection, at the end of the last WG call, we neither discussed the public comments nor debated the underlying merits of the positions regarding opening of the TMCH.
>  
> As we are all aware, we are not debating whether or not there has been abuse of the TMCH.  The only question is how much abuse has occurred.  
>  
> Further, those opposed to opening the TMCH DB to oversight appear to object on the basis that cybersquatters and wrongdoers will abuse the newly opened DB.   It does not appear that anyone rejects having oversight of the TMCH or an ability to ensure that it is operating correctly (without abuse).    Moreover, Deliotte itself commented that the TMCH should transition from a closed to open and searchable DB with the understanding that it is up to the ICANN Community to make the determination.   I recall we had discussed some compromise positions that were being considered as a way to bring oversight while protecting against cybersquatters.
>  
> Accordingly, I request that we be prepared to continue the discussion on the merits of TMCH Question 7 and find a workable position as a WG to review the TMCH and avoid abuse.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Jason
>  
>  
> From: GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2020 10:20 AM
> To: gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org
> Subject: [GNSO-RPM-WG] REMINDER: Proposed Agenda for RPMs PDP WG Meeting - 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC
>  
> Dear RPM WG members, 
>  
> As a reminder, please find the updated proposed agenda and materials below for the full WG meeting Tuesday, 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC for 90 minutes.
>  
> Kind regards,
> Mary, Ariel, and Julie
>  
> From: GNSO-RPM-WG <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund at icann.org>
> Date: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 at 3:10 PM
> To: "gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg at icann.org>
> Subject: [GNSO-RPM-WG] Proposed Agenda for RPMs PDP WG Meeting - 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC
>  
> Dear RPM WG members, 
>  
> Please find the updated proposed agenda and materials below for the full WG meeting Tuesday, 21 July 2020 at 13:00 UTC for 90 minutes.
>  
> Draft Proposed Agenda:
>  
> Review Agenda and Updates to Statements of Interest
> Revisit Discussion of TMCH Proposals #4 [docs.google.com] and #5 [docs.google.com], see the Public Comment Review Tool at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QTt_m5qdzoalRDcIUED01ur-yJgODCex8bj_-aKO7fI/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com] and the table of contents on the first tab; see also the message on the email distribution list at: [GNSO-RPM-WG] Simplified language to bring together individual TMCH #4 & #5 proposals   Paul Tattersfield
> Review of Overarching Questions #1 and #3 (skipping #2) and Additional Overarching Questions #1, #2, and #3, see the Public Comment Review Tool at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wke2krmhV2tNPNhvIOskAlLVraWp-88mqzScCtj01fw/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com] and the table of contents on the first tab
> Review of General Content Questions #1 and #2 (time permitting), see the Public Comment Review Tool at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wke2krmhV2tNPNhvIOskAlLVraWp-88mqzScCtj01fw/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com] and the table of contents on the first tab
> AOB
>  
> Best Regards,
> Mary, Julie, Ariel
> 
> 	Virus-free. www.avg.com
> _______________________________________________
> GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list
> GNSO-RPM-WG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-wg/attachments/20200720/048cf721/attachment.html>