[Gnso-ssc] FW: For your review - revised motion Nomination of GNSO Candidates for the RDS RT

[Renata Aquino Ribeiro]

Hi

Just as yesterday, I support this approach.

I just have one observation about the text of the motion - It lists
candidates first in (surname) alphabetical order and then in ranking
order.
It would be clearer if the top 4 were also on ranking order.

Thanks

Renata


On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Marika Konings
<marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:
> Thanks, Julf. I know that several of you expressed support for the approach on the way forward yesterday, but I just want to make sure that the proposed changes to the motion meet everyone’s expectations with regards to what was discussed. In addition, we especially need to hear from those of you that were not able to make the meeting.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Marika
>
> On 4/18/17, 08:53, "gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Johan Helsingius" <gnso-ssc-bounces at icann.org on behalf of julf at julf.com> wrote:
>
>     Dear Marika,
>
>     > So far
>     > I’ve only seen Poncelet express his support for the proposed way
>     > forward.
>
>     I assumed that it was clear from our call that I support this approach,
>     but let me hereby state it explicitly.
>
>         Julf
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Gnso-ssc mailing list
>     Gnso-ssc at icann.org
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ssc mailing list
> Gnso-ssc at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc