[gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs

Alexander Mayrhofer alexander.mayrhofer at nic.at
Thu Apr 3 19:07:00 UTC 2014


Maybe that post from 2013 helps? At least, ICANN clarified you can use the 9997 ID for the ICANN required monitoring registrar:

http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/2013-November/000174.html

However, it doesn't say anything about the 9998 ID...

Alex

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org] Im
> Auftrag von Rubens Kuhl
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 03. April 2014 20:05
> An: gtld-tech at icann.org
> Betreff: [gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs
> 
> 
> Hi there.
> 
> After seeing Francisco Arias's presentation during ICANN Singapore, I had a
> doubt that one person also asked during the session: if the agreement only
> specifies 9999 as Registrar ID, can we divide the registrations depending on
> its billable nature between 9998 and 9999 without breaking the agreement ?
> Agreement text says:
> "02	 iana-id		 For	cases	where	the	registry
> 	operator	acts	as
> registrar	(i.e.,	without	the	use	of	an	ICANN
> accredited	registrar)	9999	should	be	used,	otherwise
> the	sponsoring	Registrar	IANA	id	should	be	used
> 	as
> specified	in
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/registrar-ids	"
> 
> Any thoughts on that ? Any ICANN clarifications on this ?
> 
> 
> Tks,
> Rubens
> NIC.br
> 
> 
> 



More information about the gtld-tech mailing list