[gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs
Alexander Mayrhofer
alexander.mayrhofer at nic.at
Thu Apr 3 19:07:00 UTC 2014
Maybe that post from 2013 helps? At least, ICANN clarified you can use the 9997 ID for the ICANN required monitoring registrar:
http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/2013-November/000174.html
However, it doesn't say anything about the 9998 ID...
Alex
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org] Im
> Auftrag von Rubens Kuhl
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 03. April 2014 20:05
> An: gtld-tech at icann.org
> Betreff: [gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs
>
>
> Hi there.
>
> After seeing Francisco Arias's presentation during ICANN Singapore, I had a
> doubt that one person also asked during the session: if the agreement only
> specifies 9999 as Registrar ID, can we divide the registrations depending on
> its billable nature between 9998 and 9999 without breaking the agreement ?
> Agreement text says:
> "02 iana-id For cases where the registry
> operator acts as
> registrar (i.e., without the use of an ICANN
> accredited registrar) 9999 should be used, otherwise
> the sponsoring Registrar IANA id should be used
> as
> specified in
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/registrar-ids "
>
> Any thoughts on that ? Any ICANN clarifications on this ?
>
>
> Tks,
> Rubens
> NIC.br
>
>
>
More information about the gtld-tech
mailing list