[gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs
Rubens Kuhl
rubensk at nic.br
Thu Apr 3 19:39:58 UTC 2014
It seems the 9998 ID is newer than that, proposed by one back-end registry in order to ease up differentiating non-billable names like NIC, WWW, WHOIS from other registry-owned names.
Rubens
Em 03/04/2014, à(s) 16:07:000, Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer at nic.at> escreveu:
> Maybe that post from 2013 helps? At least, ICANN clarified you can use the 9997 ID for the ICANN required monitoring registrar:
>
> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/2013-November/000174.html
>
> However, it doesn't say anything about the 9998 ID...
>
> Alex
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org] Im
>> Auftrag von Rubens Kuhl
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 03. April 2014 20:05
>> An: gtld-tech at icann.org
>> Betreff: [gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs
>>
>>
>> Hi there.
>>
>> After seeing Francisco Arias's presentation during ICANN Singapore, I had a
>> doubt that one person also asked during the session: if the agreement only
>> specifies 9999 as Registrar ID, can we divide the registrations depending on
>> its billable nature between 9998 and 9999 without breaking the agreement ?
>> Agreement text says:
>> "02 iana-id For cases where the registry
>> operator acts as
>> registrar (i.e., without the use of an ICANN
>> accredited registrar) 9999 should be used, otherwise
>> the sponsoring Registrar IANA id should be used
>> as
>> specified in
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/registrar-ids "
>>
>> Any thoughts on that ? Any ICANN clarifications on this ?
>>
>>
>> Tks,
>> Rubens
>> NIC.br
>>
>>
>>
>
More information about the gtld-tech
mailing list