[gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs

[Rubens Kuhl]

It seems the 9998 ID is newer than that, proposed by one back-end registry in order to ease up differentiating non-billable names like NIC, WWW, WHOIS from other registry-owned names. 


Rubens



Em 03/04/2014, à(s) 16:07:000, Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer at nic.at> escreveu:

> Maybe that post from 2013 helps? At least, ICANN clarified you can use the 9997 ID for the ICANN required monitoring registrar:
> 
> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/2013-November/000174.html
> 
> However, it doesn't say anything about the 9998 ID...
> 
> Alex
> 
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org] Im
>> Auftrag von Rubens Kuhl
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 03. April 2014 20:05
>> An: gtld-tech at icann.org
>> Betreff: [gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs
>> 
>> 
>> Hi there.
>> 
>> After seeing Francisco Arias's presentation during ICANN Singapore, I had a
>> doubt that one person also asked during the session: if the agreement only
>> specifies 9999 as Registrar ID, can we divide the registrations depending on
>> its billable nature between 9998 and 9999 without breaking the agreement ?
>> Agreement text says:
>> "02	 iana-id		 For	cases	where	the	registry
>> 	operator	acts	as
>> registrar	(i.e.,	without	the	use	of	an	ICANN
>> accredited	registrar)	9999	should	be	used,	otherwise
>> the	sponsoring	Registrar	IANA	id	should	be	used
>> 	as
>> specified	in
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/registrar-ids	"
>> 
>> Any thoughts on that ? Any ICANN clarifications on this ?
>> 
>> 
>> Tks,
>> Rubens
>> NIC.br
>> 
>> 
>> 
>