[gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs

[Francisco Arias]

http://www.iana.org/assignments/registrar-ids/registrar-ids.xhtml

Does that explanation helps?

-- 
Francisco.






-----Original Message-----
From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br>
Date: Friday, April 4, 2014 3:39 AM
To: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer at nic.at>
Cc: "gtld-tech at icann.org" <gtld-tech at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs

>
>It seems the 9998 ID is newer than that, proposed by one back-end
>registry in order to ease up differentiating non-billable names like NIC,
>WWW, WHOIS from other registry-owned names.
>
>
>Rubens
>
>
>
>Em 03/04/2014, à(s) 16:07:000, Alexander Mayrhofer
><alexander.mayrhofer at nic.at> escreveu:
>
>> Maybe that post from 2013 helps? At least, ICANN clarified you can use
>>the 9997 ID for the ICANN required monitoring registrar:
>> 
>> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/2013-November/000174.html
>> 
>> However, it doesn't say anything about the 9998 ID...
>> 
>> Alex
>> 
>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>> Von: gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org]
>>>Im
>>> Auftrag von Rubens Kuhl
>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 03. April 2014 20:05
>>> An: gtld-tech at icann.org
>>> Betreff: [gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi there.
>>> 
>>> After seeing Francisco Arias's presentation during ICANN Singapore, I
>>>had a
>>> doubt that one person also asked during the session: if the agreement
>>>only
>>> specifies 9999 as Registrar ID, can we divide the registrations
>>>depending on
>>> its billable nature between 9998 and 9999 without breaking the
>>>agreement ?
>>> Agreement text says:
>>> "02	 iana-id		 For	cases	where	the	registry
>>> 	operator	acts	as
>>> registrar	(i.e.,	without	the	use	of	an	ICANN
>>> accredited	registrar)	9999	should	be	used,	otherwise
>>> the	sponsoring	Registrar	IANA	id	should	be	used
>>> 	as
>>> specified	in
>>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/registrar-ids	"
>>> 
>>> Any thoughts on that ? Any ICANN clarifications on this ?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Tks,
>>> Rubens
>>> NIC.br
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>