[gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs

[Rubens Kuhl]

Francisco,

The updated page helps, thanks. I'm reproducing the updated excerpt below for the list readers:


9995	Reserved for Pre-Delegation Testing transactions #1 reporting	Reserved
9996	Reserved for Pre-Delegation Testing transactions #2 reporting	Reserved
9997	Reserved for ICANN's Registry SLA Monitoring System transactions reporting	Reserved
9998	Reserved for billable transactions where Registry Operator acts as Registrar	Reserved
9999	Reserved for non-billable transactions where Registry Operator acts as Registrar	Reserved



Rubens


Em 08/04/2014, à(s) 12:33:000, Francisco Arias <francisco.arias at icann.org> escreveu:

> http://www.iana.org/assignments/registrar-ids/registrar-ids.xhtml
> 
> Does that explanation helps?
> 
> -- 
> Francisco.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br>
> Date: Friday, April 4, 2014 3:39 AM
> To: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer at nic.at>
> Cc: "gtld-tech at icann.org" <gtld-tech at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs
> 
>> 
>> It seems the 9998 ID is newer than that, proposed by one back-end
>> registry in order to ease up differentiating non-billable names like NIC,
>> WWW, WHOIS from other registry-owned names.
>> 
>> 
>> Rubens
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Em 03/04/2014, à(s) 16:07:000, Alexander Mayrhofer
>> <alexander.mayrhofer at nic.at> escreveu:
>> 
>>> Maybe that post from 2013 helps? At least, ICANN clarified you can use
>>> the 9997 ID for the ICANN required monitoring registrar:
>>> 
>>> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/2013-November/000174.html
>>> 
>>> However, it doesn't say anything about the 9998 ID...
>>> 
>>> Alex
>>> 
>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>> Von: gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org]
>>>> Im
>>>> Auftrag von Rubens Kuhl
>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 03. April 2014 20:05
>>>> An: gtld-tech at icann.org
>>>> Betreff: [gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi there.
>>>> 
>>>> After seeing Francisco Arias's presentation during ICANN Singapore, I
>>>> had a
>>>> doubt that one person also asked during the session: if the agreement
>>>> only
>>>> specifies 9999 as Registrar ID, can we divide the registrations
>>>> depending on
>>>> its billable nature between 9998 and 9999 without breaking the
>>>> agreement ?
>>>> Agreement text says:
>>>> "02	 iana-id		 For	cases	where	the	registry
>>>> 	operator	acts	as
>>>> registrar	(i.e.,	without	the	use	of	an	ICANN
>>>> accredited	registrar)	9999	should	be	used,	otherwise
>>>> the	sponsoring	Registrar	IANA	id	should	be	used
>>>> 	as
>>>> specified	in
>>>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/registrar-ids	"
>>>> 
>>>> Any thoughts on that ? Any ICANN clarifications on this ?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Tks,
>>>> Rubens
>>>> NIC.br
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>