[gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs
Rubens Kuhl
rubensk at nic.br
Tue Apr 8 16:40:51 UTC 2014
Francisco,
The updated page helps, thanks. I'm reproducing the updated excerpt below for the list readers:
9995 Reserved for Pre-Delegation Testing transactions #1 reporting Reserved
9996 Reserved for Pre-Delegation Testing transactions #2 reporting Reserved
9997 Reserved for ICANN's Registry SLA Monitoring System transactions reporting Reserved
9998 Reserved for billable transactions where Registry Operator acts as Registrar Reserved
9999 Reserved for non-billable transactions where Registry Operator acts as Registrar Reserved
Rubens
Em 08/04/2014, à(s) 12:33:000, Francisco Arias <francisco.arias at icann.org> escreveu:
> http://www.iana.org/assignments/registrar-ids/registrar-ids.xhtml
>
> Does that explanation helps?
>
> --
> Francisco.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at nic.br>
> Date: Friday, April 4, 2014 3:39 AM
> To: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer at nic.at>
> Cc: "gtld-tech at icann.org" <gtld-tech at icann.org>
> Subject: Re: [gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs
>
>>
>> It seems the 9998 ID is newer than that, proposed by one back-end
>> registry in order to ease up differentiating non-billable names like NIC,
>> WWW, WHOIS from other registry-owned names.
>>
>>
>> Rubens
>>
>>
>>
>> Em 03/04/2014, à(s) 16:07:000, Alexander Mayrhofer
>> <alexander.mayrhofer at nic.at> escreveu:
>>
>>> Maybe that post from 2013 helps? At least, ICANN clarified you can use
>>> the 9997 ID for the ICANN required monitoring registrar:
>>>
>>> http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/2013-November/000174.html
>>>
>>> However, it doesn't say anything about the 9998 ID...
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>> Von: gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org [mailto:gtld-tech-bounces at icann.org]
>>>> Im
>>>> Auftrag von Rubens Kuhl
>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 03. April 2014 20:05
>>>> An: gtld-tech at icann.org
>>>> Betreff: [gtld-tech] Registrar IDs for new gTLDs
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi there.
>>>>
>>>> After seeing Francisco Arias's presentation during ICANN Singapore, I
>>>> had a
>>>> doubt that one person also asked during the session: if the agreement
>>>> only
>>>> specifies 9999 as Registrar ID, can we divide the registrations
>>>> depending on
>>>> its billable nature between 9998 and 9999 without breaking the
>>>> agreement ?
>>>> Agreement text says:
>>>> "02 iana-id For cases where the registry
>>>> operator acts as
>>>> registrar (i.e., without the use of an ICANN
>>>> accredited registrar) 9999 should be used, otherwise
>>>> the sponsoring Registrar IANA id should be used
>>>> as
>>>> specified in
>>>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/registrar-ids "
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts on that ? Any ICANN clarifications on this ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tks,
>>>> Rubens
>>>> NIC.br
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
More information about the gtld-tech
mailing list