[gtld-tech] Registrar Expiration Date I-D

[Antoin Verschuren]

Op 27 jan. 2016, om 17:22 heeft Greg Aaron <greg at illumintel.com> het volgende geschreven:

> So I see three options:
> 1. Registrar-based WHOIS will always be required, because of expiration date
> variances we've been discussing here, caused by auto-renewals and registrar
> payment policies.
> 2. Registrar-based WHOIS goes away.  Registry WHOIS contains an Registry
> Expiration Date AND a Registrar Expiration Date field.  The registrar
> populates and manages the latter.
> 3. Registrar-based WHOIS goes away.  The WHOIS only shows the registry
> expiration date, and registrars and registrants have to communicate with
> each other about expirations and payments etc.

I see a 4th one, like Thomas Corte suggested:

4. Registrar-based WHOIS goes away.  The WHOIS does not show any
expiration date, and registrars and registrants have to communicate with
each other about expirations and payments etc.

No more discussions. I kind of like that ;-)

- --
Antoin Verschuren

Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 495 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gtld-tech/attachments/20160127/44ea87a9/signature.asc>