[Internal-cg] Consensus document - for discussion Sept 17

joseph alhadeff joseph.alhadeff at oracle.com
Tue Sep 16 12:14:39 UTC 2014

Alissa, Colleagues:

The draft is acceptable as is - thanks for your work on editing... I 
have proposed a few non-substantive edits to improve understanding - for 
example use of public comment forum may be read not to include written 
comments, propose replacing forum with consultation, etc.

One possible addition might be a reaffirmation of our commitment to 
consultation which should be differentiated from our 7 day period for 
decisions...  Possible language which could be added to making decisions 
could be:

ICG will make all reasonable efforts  to enable member stakeholder 
communities to have appropriate time to consult with their members on 
issues on which the ICG will make substantive decisions.Where 
appropriate and practicable, public comment periods will also be provided .


On 9/16/2014 4:40 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> I am at another meeting
> I have  read your edited text which seems to cover most or almost 
> every points.
> Please let me to ck it again and come back to you
> Kavouss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140916/1497dfef/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ICG Guidelines for the Decision Making-v12-MU-ALC-clean JA.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 40360 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140916/1497dfef/ICGGuidelinesfortheDecisionMaking-v12-MU-ALC-cleanJA.docx>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list