[Internal-cg] Consensus document - for discussion Sept 17

WUKnoben wolf-ulrich.knoben at t-online.de
Tue Sep 16 20:38:04 UTC 2014

Alissa, thank you very much for putting it together to an understandable document which I’m in agreement with.

I’m also fine with Joe’s edits. I think changing the headline of 3. may consequently require to remove the indents a, b and c.

In chapter 4. there is a typo in the penultimate line to c. It should read “from” instead “form”.

Looking forward to find consensus on this document tomorrow.

Best regards


From: joseph alhadeff 
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2014 2:14 PM
To: internal-cg at icann.org 
Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Consensus document - for discussion Sept 17

Alissa, Colleagues:

The draft is acceptable as is - thanks for your work on editing...  I have proposed a few non-substantive edits to improve understanding - for example use of public comment forum may be read not to include written comments, propose replacing forum with consultation, etc.

One possible addition might be a reaffirmation of our commitment to consultation which should be differentiated from our 7 day period for decisions...  Possible language which could be added to making decisions could be:

ICG will make all reasonable efforts  to enable member stakeholder communities to have appropriate time to consult with their members on issues on which the ICG will make substantive decisions.  Where appropriate and practicable, public comment periods will also be provided .


On 9/16/2014 4:40 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:

  I am at another meeting 
  I have  read your edited text which seems to cover most or almost every points.
  Please let me to ck it again and come back to you 

Internal-cg mailing list
Internal-cg at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/internal-cg/attachments/20140916/f28c080f/attachment.html>

More information about the Internal-cg mailing list