[IPC-GNSO] Icann LA Visit May 2017.

Fri May 26 14:06:49 UTC 2017

Hi Guys

Just getting back to NYC after a visit to ICANN LA HQ. Happy meetings with many. Thanks to Chantelle for arranging it.

See you all in Johannesburg.

Best
Aslam G Mohamed
RNA IP Attorneys India
US +1 646 243 9857
HQ +91 124 2841222
[cid:9465C527-B622-4C5A-A8BB-44E5A53B33E5]

On 26-May-2017, at 05:09, Jannik Skou <js at thomsentrampedach.com<mailto:js at thomsentrampedach.com>> wrote:

Hi Brian

Back from INTA Barcelona - I see your email with the idea for a call Tuesday/Wed.

Did you guys have a call? (Sorry for missing out on that). was a hectic week as always during INTA.

I see there a comments posted by INTA/BRG/BC

https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-subsequent-procedures-22mar17/2017-May/thread.html

Kind regards  |  Mit freundlichem Gruss,

Jannik Skou, MBA
Partner

Thomsen Trampedach GmbH
Grundstrasse 22a
6343 Rotkreuz
Switzerland

T    +45.22275696
M    js at thomsentrampedach.com<mailto:js at thomsentrampedach.com>
W    http://thomsentrampedach.com

On 19 May 2017, at 23:14, Brian Scarpelli <BScarpelli at actonline.org<mailto:BScarpelli at actonline.org>> wrote:

Dear IPC colleagues – apologies in advance for sending on a Friday afternoon but just a quick update/request re: IPC comments on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG’s ‘Community Comment 2’ (background document and specific questions both attached), due on May 22. [I have attached the CC2 docs, and the IPC comments on CC1 are accessible at: http://bit.ly/2q53diK]

We have not been able to get a draft comment together for IPC review yet and because of the approaching May 22 deadline would like to renew our request for volunteers to help us potentially put something together quickly on critical IPC issues. Would any further IPC members be able to help out with this? Also I have checked w Greg and we should be good to have our comments accepted if they are a little late (this is not a formal ICANN comment also).

If it can help, we could hold a call if needed, so I created a quick doodle poll for next Tues and Wed afternoons: http://doodle.com/poll/cu5daq9f8wfzvgkt. If anyone wants to help out and can indicate times that work for them we can have a call to put our heads together on this comment during this call?

-Brian

From: Jannik Skou [mailto:js at thomsentrampedach.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 7:54 AM
To: Brian Scarpelli <BScarpelli at actonline.org<mailto:BScarpelli at actonline.org>>
Cc: Mike Rodenbaugh <mike at rodenbaugh.com<mailto:mike at rodenbaugh.com>>; Kiran Malancharuvil <Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com<mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil at markmonitor.com>>; Ariel Manoff <amanoff at vmf.com.ar<mailto:amanoff at vmf.com.ar>>; Aslam Mohamed <aslam at rnaip.com<mailto:aslam at rnaip.com>>; Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>>; Chantelle Doerksen (chantelle.doerksen at icann.org<mailto:chantelle.doerksen at icann.org>) <chantelle.doerksen at icann.org<mailto:chantelle.doerksen at icann.org>>; listserv at ipconstituency.org<mailto:listserv at ipconstituency.org>
Subject: Re: [IPC Discussion List] Drafting IPC Comments re: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Community Comment Request (due May 1)

Hi Brian, Mike, Kiran, Paul, Hector and Aslam

Please find attached my own comments already submitted.

Your spread sheet makes sense.

It seems very likely that the deadline will be extended to May 22nd.  (see email from Jeff today) as the GAC has requested more time, as I understood it.

I would suggest we organise a short call to discuss how we best put the comments together.

Also maybe we could meet during GDD in Madrid and then discuss any points we seem to disagree on? (Provided the deadline is extended of course).

I suggest a native US/UK member take the lead (also) on drafting final text :-)

Kind regards  |  Mit freundlichem Gruss,

Jannik Skou, MBA
Partner

Thomsen Trampedach GmbH
Grundstrasse 22a
6343 Rotkreuz
Switzerland

T +45.22275696
M js at thomsentrampedach.com<mailto:js at thomsentrampedach.com>
W http://thomsentrampedach.com

On 18 Apr 2017, at 13:14, Brian Scarpelli <BScarpelli at actonline.org<mailto:BScarpelli at actonline.org>> wrote:

(copying entire IPC in case we have additional volunteers)

Dear Mike, Jannik, Paul, Kiran, Héctor & Aslam – thanks very much for volunteering to help with IPC input on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG’s ‘Community Comment 2’ (background document and specific questions both attached). This comment is due May 1.

I have created a pretty basic shared spreadsheet that we can use to organize input if that is helpful:http://bit.ly/2pM6FPN. Would anyone be interested in taking the lead in drafting for this comment? If I could help us get a call together I’m happy to do that.

If it is helpful here’s a link to the IPC’s comments from August last year re: ‘Community Comment 1’:
·       IPC Response to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group’s First Request for Community Comments (19 August 2016)

Lastly, for anyone who wants to take a look at the different comment opportunities for the IPC that we’ve been tracking, filed on, or are considering filing on, please visit: http://bit.ly/2oBY18z

-Brian

Brian Scarpelli
Senior Policy Counsel
517-507-1446 | bscarpelli at actonline.org<mailto:bscarpelli at actonline.org>
ACT | The App Association

From: listserv at ipconstituency.simplelists.com<mailto:listserv at ipconstituency.simplelists.com> [mailto:listserv at ipconstituency.simplelists.com] On Behalf Of Brian Scarpelli
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 7:37 AM
To: listserv at ipconstituency.org<mailto:listserv at ipconstituency.org>
Cc: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>>; Chantelle Doerksen (chantelle.doerksen at icann.org<mailto:chantelle.doerksen at icann.org>) <chantelle.doerksen at icann.org<mailto:chantelle.doerksen at icann.org>>
Subject: [IPC Discussion List] Request for Volunteers -- New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Community Comment Request (due May 1)

IPC colleagues –

The leadership team of the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG is seeking community input through Community Comment 2, with comments requested by May 1. Please see attached for (1) a backgrounder and survey of subjects comments are requested on, and (2) specific questions the PDP WG is seeking responses to [both PDF and Word]. I plan to circulate a template for gathering our input soon.

This survey is extensive and the IPC may only wish to provide answers to certain questions that relate to its own particular interests or concerns. Please let myself and Chantelle know if you are interested in helping with an IPC response to this survey.

Brian

Brian Scarpelli
Senior Policy Counsel
517-507-1446 | bscarpelli at actonline.org<mailto:bscarpelli at actonline.org>
ACT | The App Association

<Community Comment 2 letter_IPC_20 March 2017.pdf><New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Community Comment 2.pdf>

<Community Comment 2 letter_IPC_20 March 2017.pdf><New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Community Comment 2.pdf>

________________________________
IMPORTANT NOTICE - The contents of this email and attachments are confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. Copying or communicating any part of it to others is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or rely on this email and should please return it immediately or notify us by telephone. While we take every reasonable precaution to screen out computer viruses from emails, attachments to this email may contain such viruses. We cannot accept liability for loss or damage resulting from such viruses. The integrity of email across the Internet cannot be guaranteed and RNA will not accept liability for any claims arising as a result of the use of this medium for transmissions by or to RNA.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ipc-gnso/attachments/20170526/38e34676/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image1.jpeg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 571453 bytes
Desc: image1.jpeg
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ipc-gnso/attachments/20170526/38e34676/image1-0001.jpeg>