[NCAP-Discuss] [Ext] Re: Please review the Study 1 proposal

[Matt Larson]

On May 22, 2019, at 3:52 PM, Danny McPherson <danny at tcb.net<mailto:danny at tcb.net>> wrote:

On 2019-05-22 11:00, Matt Larson wrote:
Folks,
Please review the NCAP Study 1 proposal
(https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_15f1Kh2vuY0yF9SelocGrPOguYPXDeFYZ0lTqx3fU-5FgI_edit&d=DwIDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=xhCX8vQGcsNMzNMbgIokNle9Mpt6sQ45tM98iwh4H0w&m=FK7lldDQtv6Xf0m5ObQvGlhh3CcMbIegNH7WiJjSQwM&s=2O-Yn5V2FlLp0uaQW2darHQw9M9BcRBJwN_HZwMDOVs&e=)
before today's call, if possible.
In particular, please note comments from Steve Sheng and me.
Thanks and talk to everyone in a few hours,

Matt,
A little more time to review would have been helpful

Please see Steve Sheng's message from May 16 copied below: the content you are commenting on has been in the document since May 8 when Jay suggested it.

but regardless, I think you've got most of items 1.b and 1.c totally backwards.

The document is not mine nor OCTO's; it is a work product of the NCAP DG, so your comments should be addressed to the rest of the NCAP DG.

TO suggest new registrations of expired domains are in scope of name collisions surprises me, and that bit flips or other things that may result in persistent collisions are out of scope seems to ignore the immense amount of SSAC work that led to this WP.  I think perhaps both may be out of scope but where you arrived with expired domains being re-registered as in scope confuses me, can you explain the genesis of that in any dialog we've had or in the SSAC direction provided?

Likewise, those questions should be addressed to the NCAP DG.

Matt


Begin forwarded message:

From: Steve Sheng <steve.sheng at icann.org<mailto:steve.sheng at icann.org>>
Subject: [NCAP-Discuss] LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS: Study 1 Proposal
Date: May 16, 2019 at 4:12:15 PM EDT
To: "ncap-discuss at icann.org<mailto:ncap-discuss at icann.org>" <ncap-discuss at icann.org<mailto:ncap-discuss at icann.org>>

Dear NCAP discussion group,

  Thank you for the feedback on the study 1 proposal. Please see the updated version as of 16 May 2019.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/15f1Kh2vuY0yF9SelocGrPOguYPXDeFYZ0lTqx3fU_gI/edit?usp=sharing

  The NCAP Co-chairs would like to initiate a last call for comments on this document.

  Please provide your inputs, if any, by close of business, Monday 20 May 2019.  After that, the document will be finalized pending copy edits and send to ICANN office of the CTO.

Best
Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20190522/b6f999ca/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NCAP Study 1.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 142146 bytes
Desc: NCAP Study 1.pdf
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20190522/b6f999ca/NCAPStudy1-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20190522/b6f999ca/ATT00001-0001.htm>