[NCAP-Discuss] [Ext] Re: Please review the Study 1 proposal

[Danny McPherson]

Err, my bad Matt, thanks for the prompt response and clarification!

NCAP WP - not sure I've seen it before but my objection stands, why 
would we include a new registration of an expired domain as a name 
collision?


-danny


On 2019-05-22 16:01, Matt Larson wrote:
>> On May 22, 2019, at 3:52 PM, Danny McPherson <danny at tcb.net> wrote:
>> On 2019-05-22 11:00, Matt Larson wrote:
>> 
>>> Folks,
>>> Please review the NCAP Study 1 proposal
>>> 
>> 
> (https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_15f1Kh2vuY0yF9SelocGrPOguYPXDeFYZ0lTqx3fU-5FgI_edit&d=DwIDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=xhCX8vQGcsNMzNMbgIokNle9Mpt6sQ45tM98iwh4H0w&m=FK7lldDQtv6Xf0m5ObQvGlhh3CcMbIegNH7WiJjSQwM&s=2O-Yn5V2FlLp0uaQW2darHQw9M9BcRBJwN_HZwMDOVs&e=)
>>> before today's call, if possible.
>>> In particular, please note comments from Steve Sheng and me.
>>> Thanks and talk to everyone in a few hours,
>> 
>> Matt,
>> A little more time to review would have been helpful
> 
> Please see Steve Sheng's message from May 16 copied below: the content
> you are commenting on has been in the document since May 8 when Jay
> suggested it.
> 
>> but regardless, I think you've got most of items 1.b and 1.c totally
>> backwards.
> 
>  The document is not mine nor OCTO's; it is a work product of the NCAP
> DG, so your comments should be addressed to the rest of the NCAP DG.
> 
>> TO suggest new registrations of expired domains are in scope of name
>> collisions surprises me, and that bit flips or other things that may
>> result in persistent collisions are out of scope seems to ignore the
>> immense amount of SSAC work that led to this WP.  I think perhaps
>> both may be out of scope but where you arrived with expired domains
>> being re-registered as in scope confuses me, can you explain the
>> genesis of that in any dialog we've had or in the SSAC direction
>> provided?
> 
> Likewise, those questions should be addressed to the NCAP DG.
> 
> Matt
> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> FROM: Steve Sheng <steve.sheng at icann.org>
>> 
>> SUBJECT: [NCAP-DISCUSS] LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS: STUDY 1 PROPOSAL
>> 
>> DATE: May 16, 2019 at 4:12:15 PM EDT
>> 
>> TO: "ncap-discuss at icann.org" <ncap-discuss at icann.org>
>> 
>> Dear NCAP discussion group,
>> 
>> Thank you for the feedback on the study 1 proposal. Please see
>> the updated version as of 16 May 2019.
>> 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/15f1Kh2vuY0yF9SelocGrPOguYPXDeFYZ0lTqx3fU_gI/edit?usp=sharing
>> 
>> 
>> The NCAP Co-chairs would like to initiate a last call for
>> comments on this document.
>> 
>> Please provide your inputs, if any, by close of business,_ Monday
>> 20 May 2019._  After that, the document will be finalized pending
>> copy edits and send to ICANN office of the CTO.
>> 
>> Best
>> Steve