[NCAP-Discuss] NCAP DG weekly meeting - agenda for 21 July 2021

Wed Sep 15 17:09:26 UTC 2021

Anne,

I’m sorry for the long delay in responding.  As we get ready for 
taking on our final analysis task I’m just tying up some loose ends.

Having added the recommendations to the notes for the Board questions, I 
want to suggest that we will go over the recommendations the next time 
we review the Board questions.

Speaking personally, I also note that while I agree NCAP should take as 
input to its work the SubPro final report, specifically those elements 
you have excerpted, I’m don’t yet have a suggestion for to address 
the apparent connection.  We could certainly include appropriate 
references and remarks in our report, it’s just that I don’t know if 
there’s a “formal” mechanism for feeding our comments back to the 
GNSO Council.  I’m sure our work won’t go unnoticed there, so 
perhaps there’s no action required from us on this point.  I’m open 
to suggestions of course.

Thanks,

Jim

On 30 Jul 2021, at 18:31, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote:

> Thanks Jim.  I wonder if it is worth devoting some time in the meeting 
> to go over these recommendations from the GNSO Council to the Board?  
> It seems there should be a connection between that Consensus Policy 
> and our approach to answering the questions since the Board now has 
> this on its plate. The Board did not have this when they posed the 
> questions.
>
> Have a good weekend.
> Anne
>
> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
>
> Of Counsel
>
>
>
> AAikman at lewisroca.com<mailto:AAikman at lewisroca.com>
>
> D. 520.629.4428
>
> [cid:image002.png at 01D78557.FD4DEAF0]
>
>
>
> From: James Galvin <galvin at elistx.com>
> Sent: Friday, July 30, 2021 3:29 PM
> To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman at lewisroca.com>
> Cc: Kinga Kowalcyzk <kinga.kowalcyzk at icann.org>; 
> ncap-discuss at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [NCAP-Discuss] NCAP DG weekly meeting - agenda for 21 
> July 2021
>
> [EXTERNAL]
> ________________________________
>
> Thanks Anne.
>
> I have added these notes to Board Question 8 notes.
>
> Jim
>
>
> On 21 Jul 2021, at 16:16, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Attached is Topic 29 on Name Collisions from the SubPro Final Report 
> that was adopted by GNSO Council and sent to the Board.
>
>
>
> 29.3 talks about the “DO NOT APPLY” list that is recommended as 
> Implementation Guidance.
>
> 29.4 talks about making all applied-for strings being subject to “a 
> DNS Stability evaluation to determine whether they represent a name 
> collision risk”
>
> 29.5 says “the ICANN community should develop name collision risk 
> criteria and a test to provide information to an applicant for any 
> given string after the application window closes so that the applicant 
> can determine if they (sic) should move forward with evaluation.”
>
>
>
> 29.6 deals with some specifics of Controlled Interruption.
>
>
>
> IMPORTANTLY – the Council adopted the Sub Pro Recommendation which 
> requires ICANN to have a mechanism ready for evaluation of the risk of 
> name collisions both prior to the opening of the next application 
> window and during the string evaluation process.  The language used 
> was “must” which is a defined term in the Sub Pro Final Report 
> meaning this is obligatory so the Board is going to need a 
> “mechanism”.
>
>
>
> Recommendation 29.1 says [cid:image001.png at 01D77E32.9E687770]
>
> Anne
>
>
>
> From: NCAP-Discuss 
> <ncap-discuss-bounces at icann.org<mailto:ncap-discuss-bounces at icann.org>> 
> On Behalf Of Kinga Kowalcyzk
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2021 2:24 PM
> To: ncap-discuss at icann.org<mailto:ncap-discuss at icann.org>
> Subject: [NCAP-Discuss] NCAP DG weekly meeting - agenda for 21 July 
> 2021
>
>
>
> [EXTERNAL]
>
> ________________________________
>
> Dear NCAP Discussion Group,
>
>
>
> Please find below the agenda for the upcoming weekly meeting:
>
>
>
> NCAP DG Agenda for 21 July, 2021
>
>   1.  Welcome and roll call
>   2.  Action Item review
>   3.  Review Board question transformation from statements to 
> questions (Question 8 and 9): 
> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1gHuQP08qelDqZ5jG2r8B-gXnAfg2K9PN?usp=sharing 
> [drive.google.com]<https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1gHuQP08qelDqZ5jG2r8B-gXnAfg2K9PN?usp=sharing%20%5bdrive.google.com%5d>
>   4.  AOB
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Kinga
>
>
>
> Kinga Kowalczyk
>
> Administrative Assistant
>
> Office of the Chief Technical Officer (OCTO)
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers 
> (ICANN<http://www.icann.org/> )
>
>
>
> Mobile: +1 312-709-1170
>
> Email: kinga.kowalczyk at icann.org<mailto:kinga.kowalczyk at icann.org>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of 
> this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the 
> employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment 
> to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any 
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any 
> attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to 
> the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any 
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and 
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the 
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>
> _______________________________________________
> NCAP-Discuss mailing list
> NCAP-Discuss at icann.org<mailto:NCAP-Discuss at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ncap-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of 
> your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list 
> accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy 
> (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of 
> Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman 
> link above to change your membership status or configuration, 
> including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling 
> delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
> ________________________________
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the 
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of 
> this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the 
> employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment 
> to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any 
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any 
> attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
> communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to 
> the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any 
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and 
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the 
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/attachments/20210915/ed7a8446/attachment-0001.html>