[NCAP-Discuss] material for discussion 16 March 2022

[Jeff Schmidt]

Again, I must insist that we carefully define "Enhanced Controlled Interruption" prior to discussing its inclusion in a "Workflow." We do not have a shared technically rigorous definition of what "Enhanced Controlled Interruption" actually is and many people on this workgroup are proceeding under widely varying assumptions.

Please see my note to this list 26 Feb:
https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ncap-discuss/2022-February/000794.html

Also, tantalizingly, SSAC is preparing some sort of alternative (Slide 7) to something. Great. We can't discuss its inclusion in a "Workflow" until there is clarity on this.

Cart squarely before horse.

Jeff


> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCAP-Discuss <ncap-discuss-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of James
> Galvin
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 9:34 AM
> To: NCAP Discussion Group <ncap-discuss at icann.org>
> Subject: [NCAP-Discuss] material for discussion 16 March 2022
> 
> Attached is a PDF of the following slide deck located on our shared drive:
> 
> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_cxn5oKOweO48w3Lv7dCYU7Gt
> wjzwTJOluLZfcIEGfY/edit#slide=id.p
> 
> The principal topic for discussion on Wednesday, 16 March 2022, will be our
> Name Collision Analysis Workflow.
> 
> This slide deck will look different than previous version but it does not
> change the 5 steps we have previously discussed and agreed to.  What it
> focuses on is the goal of each step and what is needed to accomplish that
> goal.
> 
> The need for this is coming from the drafting team for our final work product.
> As part of proposing text for review by the Discussion Group we are
> identifying points for which it would be helpful to get some broad discussion
> first, including settling on a consistent set of terminology.
> 
> We will review our workflow from the perspective of understanding why and
> how we move from step to step.
> 
> See you all tomorrow!
> 
> Jim